My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/25/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
8/25/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:13:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/25/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />A review of the solid waste capacity for the active segment of the county landfill indicates the <br />availability of more than 830,000 cubic yards. The active segment of the landfill has a 1 year <br />capacity, and the landfill has expansion capacity beyond 2010. Based on the analysis, staff <br />determined that the county landfill can accommodate the additional solid waste generated by the site <br />under the proposed zoning district. <br />- Drainage <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require <br />on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater <br />Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited <br />from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the <br />approved IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property <br />does not he within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. <br />With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of <br />impervious surface would be approximately 249,599 square feet, or 5.73 acres. The maximum <br />runoff volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, <br />and given the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 274,570 cubic feet. <br />In order to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain <br />approximately 205,225 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject <br />property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 31.17 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staff's analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site <br />discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and <br />requiring retention of 205,225 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />- Recreation <br />A review of county recreation facilities and the projected demand that would result from the most <br />intense development that could occur on the property under the proposed zoning district indicates <br />that the adopted levels of service would be maintained. The table below illustrates the additional <br />park demand associated with the proposed development of the property and the existing surplus <br />acreage. <br />Park Information <br />LOS (Acres per 1,000 Population) <br />Project Demand (Acres) <br />Surplus Acreage <br />4.0 <br />0.5244 <br />838.5 <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. <br />Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />August 25, 1998 <br />31 <br />t6 6-Y 106 Fl{ "E t' J" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.