My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/1/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
9/1/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:14:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/01/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fr - <br />Bog <br />4. Consistent result. Treating acquired rights-of-way and Murphy Deed Reservation areas the <br />same in regard to setbacks will result in consistent setbacks along roadways. Such <br />consistency ensures a minimum area of open space/green area along roadways between <br />buildings and pavement. Treating reservation areas differently would result in varied building <br />setbacks along many roadways where segments of acquired right-of-way adjoin segments of <br />reservation area The segment of 474 Avenue adjacent to the Segals' property is such a <br />segment. For f pure 43'd Avenue improvements, the county will need to acquire right"f-way <br />adjacent to the subject reservation area On those adjacent sites, structures will not be <br />allowed to be built up to the right-of-way line as now proposed by the Segals. <br />*Board Options <br />The matter before the Board is not specifically addressed in the LDRs. In staffs opinion, the matter <br />involves two issues. One is the county's Murphy Deed Reservation policy, while the other is whether <br />or not the Segals relied on county action to their detriment. Based on these two issues, the Board <br />could: <br />1. Affirm the existing county policy of treating reservation areas as rights-of-way for setback <br />purposes, and deny the appeal (upholding the County Administrator's decision). <br />2. Affirm the existing county policy, but permit the appeal based on a finding that county actions <br />were relied upon by the Segals to their detriment. <br />Change county policy to treat reservation areas as easements that can count toward meeting <br />setback requirements, and grant the appeal. <br />The Board can attach conditions to any decision made. <br />RECOMMENDATION: <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners affirm cu: rent county policy regarding <br />Murphy Deed Reservation areas and deny the appeal (upholding the County Administrator's <br />decision). <br />SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 <br />-74- <br />• 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.