Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Bob Keating reviewed a Memorandum of <br />September 3, 1998 using the Zoning Map projected on the ELMO: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D TMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE <br />obert M. Keating,CP <br />THROUGH: Sasan Rohani, AICP .S' .5 _ <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />FROM: Peter -J. Radke <br />Economic Development Planner, Long -Range Planning <br />DATE: September 3, 1998 <br />RE: Scott Perry's Request to Amend the Comprehensive Plan to Redesignate <br />Approximately 2.1 acres from M-2 to C/I and to Rezone that 2.1 acres from <br />RM -10 to CG. <br />PLAN AMENDMENT NUMBER: LUDA 98-01-0177 <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of September 22, 1998. <br />This is a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and rezone approximately 2. 10 acres. The <br />subject property is located at the southeast comer of 45`' Street and 24h Avenue, and continues <br />south along 24" Avenue for approximately 500 feet. The request involves changing the land use <br />designation from M-2, Medium- Density Residential - 2 (up to 10 units/acre), to C/I, <br />Commercial/Industrial, and rezoning th_e property from RM -10, Multiple -Family Residential District <br />(up to 10 units/acre), to CG, General Commercial, Zoning District. <br />On March 26, 1998, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend that the Board <br />of County Commissioners approve the proposed land use amendment and rezoning. <br />On April 28, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners voted 5 to 0 to transmit the proposed land <br />use amendment request to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for its review. The <br />Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not to adopt the requested land use <br />designation amendment and zoning district amendment. <br />Consistent with state regulations, DCA reviewed the proposed amendment and prepared an <br />Objections, Recommendations and Comments (ORC) Report (dated August 5, 1998), which <br />planning staff received on August 7, 1998. The DCA ORC Report (attachment 7) contained four <br />objections to this proposed amendment. Those objections are listed below. <br />September 22, 1998 <br />37 <br />am 107 FADE .1.04 <br />