My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/22/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
9/22/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:58 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:19:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/22/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
117
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />property under the existing land use designation is 212. This was determined by multiplying the 21 <br />units (most intense use) by ITE's single-family residential factor of 10.1 Average Daily Trip <br />Ends/unit. <br />The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />property under the proposed land use designation is 2,498. This was determined by multiplying the <br />21,000 square feet of shopping center use (most.intense use) by ITE's shopping center fitted curve <br />factor of 119 Average Daily Trip Ends/1,000 square feet. <br />Since the county's transportation level of service is based on peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />characteristics, the transportation concurrency analysis addresses project traffic occurring in the peak <br />hour and affecting the peak direction of impacted roadways. According to ITE, the proposed use <br />generates more volume in the p.m. peak hour than in the a.m. peak hour. Therefore, the p.m. peak <br />hour was used in the transportation concurrency analysis. The peak direction during the p.m. peak <br />hour on 45`h Street is westbound. <br />Given those conditions, the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be <br />generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the existing land use designation was <br />calculated to be 7. This was determined by multiplying the total number of units allowed (21) under <br />the existing land use designation by ITE's factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit, to determine the <br />total number of trips generated. Of these trips, 65% will be inbound and 35% will be outbound. Of <br />the inbound trips, 50% or 7 will be westbound. <br />To determine the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation, the total square <br />footage of shopping center allowed under the proposed amendment (21,000) was multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 10.87 p.m. peak hour trips/1,000 square feet to determine the total number of trips <br />generated (228). Of these trips, 49% or 110 trips are new trips, which are due to the proposed land <br />use designation. From the new trips, 48% (53) will be inbound and 52% (57) will be outbound. Of <br />the inbound trips, 65% or 34 trips will originate from the east of the subject property. Therefore, the <br />most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation would generate 27 <br />(34 - 7 = 27) more peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips than the 7 that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject property under the existing land use designation. <br />Using a modified gravity model and a hand assignment, the peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips generated by the proposed use were then assigned to impacted roads on the network. Impacted <br />roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive <br />five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more of the project trips, whichever <br />is less. <br />Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are calculated and updated annually, <br />utilizing the latest and best available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix G <br />September 22, 1998 <br />42 <br />Existing Land Use <br />Proposed Land Use <br />Designation <br />Designation <br />4. Number of Peak Hour/Peak Season/Peak Direction Trips <br />6.89 <br />34 <br />Generated: <br />5. Number of Average Weekday Trips Generated: <br />212.1 <br />2,498 <br />6. Traffic Capacity on This Segment of 45' Street, at a <br />760 peak hour/peak <br />I <br />760 peak houripeak <br />LOS "D" <br />season/peak direction <br />season/peak direction <br />trips <br />trips <br />7. Total Segment Demand (Existing Volume+ Vested <br />352 peak/hour/peak <br />352 peak/hour/peak <br />Volume) on This Segment of 45`s Street <br />season/peak direction <br />seasonipeak direction <br />trips <br />trips <br />The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />property under the existing land use designation is 212. This was determined by multiplying the 21 <br />units (most intense use) by ITE's single-family residential factor of 10.1 Average Daily Trip <br />Ends/unit. <br />The number of Average Weekday Trip Ends associated with the most intense use of the subject <br />property under the proposed land use designation is 2,498. This was determined by multiplying the <br />21,000 square feet of shopping center use (most.intense use) by ITE's shopping center fitted curve <br />factor of 119 Average Daily Trip Ends/1,000 square feet. <br />Since the county's transportation level of service is based on peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />characteristics, the transportation concurrency analysis addresses project traffic occurring in the peak <br />hour and affecting the peak direction of impacted roadways. According to ITE, the proposed use <br />generates more volume in the p.m. peak hour than in the a.m. peak hour. Therefore, the p.m. peak <br />hour was used in the transportation concurrency analysis. The peak direction during the p.m. peak <br />hour on 45`h Street is westbound. <br />Given those conditions, the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be <br />generated by the most intense use of the subject property under the existing land use designation was <br />calculated to be 7. This was determined by multiplying the total number of units allowed (21) under <br />the existing land use designation by ITE's factor of 1.01 p.m. peak hour trips/unit, to determine the <br />total number of trips generated. Of these trips, 65% will be inbound and 35% will be outbound. Of <br />the inbound trips, 50% or 7 will be westbound. <br />To determine the number of peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation, the total square <br />footage of shopping center allowed under the proposed amendment (21,000) was multiplied by ITE's <br />factor of 10.87 p.m. peak hour trips/1,000 square feet to determine the total number of trips <br />generated (228). Of these trips, 49% or 110 trips are new trips, which are due to the proposed land <br />use designation. From the new trips, 48% (53) will be inbound and 52% (57) will be outbound. Of <br />the inbound trips, 65% or 34 trips will originate from the east of the subject property. Therefore, the <br />most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation would generate 27 <br />(34 - 7 = 27) more peak hour/peak season/peak direction trips than the 7 that would be generated by <br />the most intense use of the subject property under the existing land use designation. <br />Using a modified gravity model and a hand assignment, the peak hour/peak season/peak direction <br />trips generated by the proposed use were then assigned to impacted roads on the network. Impacted <br />roads are defined in section 910.09(4)(b)3 of the county's LDRs as roadway segments which receive <br />five percent (5%) or more of the project traffic or fifty (50) or more of the project trips, whichever <br />is less. <br />Capacities for all roadway segments in Indian River County are calculated and updated annually, <br />utilizing the latest and best available peak season traffic characteristics and applying Appendix G <br />September 22, 1998 <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.