Laserfiche WebLink
r: <br />• <br />14. Landscape & Buffering: A Type "B" buffer will be constructed along all project perimeters <br />except Jungle Trail, where separate buffer details have been approved for differem sections <br />of the Trail, and adjacent to the Sanderling Subdivision where a Type "A" buffer is being <br />recommended <br />15. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: <br />North: Ocean Way Subdivision, Grove/RS-3, RM -3, A-1 <br />South: The Sanderling Subdivision, Town of Orchid multi-family/RM-3, residential <br />East: Atlantic Ocean/N/A <br />West: Indian River/N/A <br />16. Planning and Zoning Commission Action: <br />At its August 27, 1998 meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that <br />the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Windsor conceptual PD <br />modifications and expansion with three additional conditions. Those recommended <br />conditions are to limit the 9.4 acre enclave to 24 residential units (2.55 units per acre), <br />prohibit any structure seaward of the 1987 Coastal Construction Control Line, and require <br />a 30' wide Type "A" buffer along the entire south property line. Staff has included in its <br />recommendation the condition regarding the Type "A" buffer, but has not included the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission's recommended conditions regarding the reduction to 24 <br />units or the CCCL special restriction. <br />Conditions for the 9.4 Acre Enclave Area <br />DEVELOPMENT <br />BY "RIGHT" <br />APPROVED PD <br />PROPOSED PD <br />P & Z C <br />STAFF <br />ASPECT <br />STANDARD <br />RECOhMENDATION <br />RECONBOMATION <br />ZONING <br />Density <br />3 Units/Acre <br />3.19 Units/Acre <br />3.19 Units / Acre <br />2.55 Units / Acre <br />2.97 Units / Acre <br />(30 units) <br />(24 units) <br />(28 units) <br />Perimeter Setbacks <br />15' Sideyard <br />25' <br />25' <br />30' Type "A" Buffer <br />30' Type "A" Buffer <br />(except ocean <br />25' Rearyard <br />Type "B" Buffer <br />setback) <br />10' for Pools <br />Open Space <br />40% <br />40% <br />40% <br />400/6 <br />40% <br />Housing Type <br />Multi -Family <br />Beach Cottages <br />Multi -Family <br />Multi -Family <br />Multi -Family <br />*CCCL <br />As Allowed by <br />As Allowed by <br />As Allowed by <br />Use 1987 CCCL as <br />As Allowed by <br />(ocean setback) <br />DEP Permit <br />DEP Permit <br />DEP Permit <br />absolute setback lime. <br />DEP Permit <br />• Coesml Construction Control line (see graphic atmchman g s ) <br />Subsequent to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, staff analyzed the <br />Commission's recommendations. Based upon that analysis, staff decided to retain its <br />original recommendation regarding the CCCL setback, while modifying its recommendation <br />regarding the maximum number of units allowed in the 9.4 acre enclave area Staffs final <br />recommendation was based on consideration of the Planning and Zoning Commission's <br />action, consideration of allowances of the underlying zoning district, and consideration of <br />the anticipated impacts of the Planning and Zoning Commission's proposed changes. <br />With respect to the density issue, staff recommends that 28 units be approved in the 9.4 acre <br />enclave. This will result in a density of less than 3 units per acre. This density is consistent <br />with the underlying RM -3 zoning of the site. As approved, the Windsor conceptual PD plan <br />allows construction of 15 beach cottages on the 4.7 beachfront acres that are already in the <br />PD, resulting in a density of 3.19 units per acre. By adding 4.7 acres to the project and <br />allocating 15 out of the project's total 400 units to that 4.7 acres, the applicant proposes 30 <br />units on 9.4 acres, resulting in a density of 3.19 units/acre for the beachfront enclave. Since <br />one purpose of a PD is to allow density shifting within an overall project and since the <br />Windsor project's overall density is less than one unit per acre, the developer's request for <br />30 units could be granted Sta$ however, recommends a reduction to 28 units, since this <br />is consistent with the underlying zoning of the 9.4 acre tract and represents the number of <br />units that a developer could expect "by right" with the existing zoning. <br />OCTOBER 6, 1998 <br />-40- BOOK 107 <br />PAGE 4f-' <br />