Laserfiche WebLink
If the resurfacing is not performed when the paved shoulders <br />are added, a longitudinal joint will exist at both edges of the <br />existing road where old pavement meets new pavement. This joint <br />could result in differential settlement and an unsafe roadway. DOT <br />has stated that the ISTEA funds are limited for DOT to pay the <br />$120,000 cost for entire resurfacing. <br />The alternatives are: <br />Alternative No, 1 <br />County approve the JPA and fund the resurfacing with <br />Local Option Gas Tax Revenue (Fund 109). <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Do not resurface the existing road as a part of the <br />project. <br />Staff recommends that the Board approve for the Chairman's <br />signature the following: <br />1) the attached JPA for resurfacing 58th Avenue, <br />2) the attached resolution authorizing the JPA, <br />3) the attached Memorandum of Agreement. <br />Funding to be from Fund 109 Secondary Road Construction. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board, by <br />a 4-0 vote (Commissioner Eggert being absent), <br />unanimously, adopted Resolution 98-120 authorizing <br />participation with the State of Florida Department of <br />Transportation for certain road improvements along <br />County Road 510 east of US 1. <br />AGREEMENT IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE <br />OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />OCTOBER 27, 1998 <br />f�: <br />