My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/17/1998
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1998
>
11/17/1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:10:59 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 11:27:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 10 .7 PAGE <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />Staff has conducted a survey of the shoreline to identify areas of <br />severe erosion. Table No. 1 lists the areas which would be <br />considered for emergency permit issuance for beach scraping. <br />Tabla No 12 Potantlal Raaoh Seraninc Areas <br />LOCATION <br />Length of <br />Comments <br />End -loader <br />Shoreline <br />$270/day <br />Treasure Shores Park <br />300 ft. <br />Lost 10-15 ft of Dune. <br />$540/day <br />Repairs required to dune <br />crossover. <br />Golden Sands Park <br />600 ft. <br />Lost 10-15 ft of Dune. <br />Repairs required to dune <br />crossover. <br />Wabasso Beach Park & <br />300 ft. & <br />Lost 10-15 ft of Dune. <br />Summerplace <br />500 ft. <br />Unprotected property <br />severely eroded. <br />Other areas of the County were severely eroded as well, however, the <br />lack of sand in the system would not warrant beach scraping activity at <br />this time. <br />The majority of the areas listed in Table No. 1 are reported as areas of <br />"critical erosion" in the County's Beach Preservation Plan and are <br />recommended for a beach restoration project during the fall of the year <br />2000. Where "critical erosion" is defined as: <br />A segment of coastline where natural processes or human activity have <br />caused erosion to a degree that upland development, recreational <br />interests, wildlife habitat, or cultural resources are threatened or lost. <br />In considering the costs associated with conducting beach scraping <br />activity, Table No. 2 list the relative costs of utilizing County <br />personnel and equipment to complete the work. The end -loader would be <br />used to complete the beach scraping and the bulldozer would be needed to <br />assist the end -loader when exiting the beach. <br />Table No. 22 Relatad Aosta <br />EQCIP140 w <br />OPERATOR in= <br />TOTAL COST <br />End -loader <br />$150/day $120/day <br />$270/day <br />D-7 Bulldozer <br />$150/day $120/day <br />$270/day <br />$540/day <br />Equipment cost associated with the preparation of the end -loader are <br />described below. The end -loader is equipped with a rake and would <br />require a bucket to perform the beach scraping activity. <br />• Purchase used bucket/shipping/labor $ 91000 <br />Time: 2-3 weeks <br />• Purchase new bucket/shipping/labor $12,000 <br />Time: 2-3 weeks <br />Other miscellaneous cost associated with beach scraping would include <br />the following: <br />• Purchase sand to construct access ramps $ 1,500/per access <br />In analyzing the condition of the shoreline, staff has prepared the <br />following alternatives. <br />Alternatives No. 1 <br />Approve the issuance of an emergency permit for beach scraping <br />in those areas identified in Table No. 1 utilizing County <br />personnel and equipment to complete the work. Public property <br />would be funded from the County's Beach Preservation Fund <br />while unprotected private property would be required to pay <br />the cost -in accordance with Table No. 2. <br />NOVEMBER 17, 1998 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.