My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/9/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
2/9/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:55 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:20:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/09/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Macht assured Mr. Glynn they would be taking a much longer look at the <br />Plan and asked Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar if he wished to comment. <br />Coastal Engineer Jeff Tabar stated that staff and the consultants were aware of the <br />issues that Mr. Glynn pointed out prior to his two meetings with Mr. Glynn recently. The <br />reason for some of the issues is the distribution of benefits. Certain funding scenarios will <br />be prepared for the Board, as part of Phase 2, and will be brought back with options on <br />which formulae will work for the project areas or the county as a whole. These things will <br />be presented and worked out during Phase 2 of the program. He has already met with <br />concerned citizens individually and would be happy to meet with more. Further, he has <br />given many presentations to the different communities along the shoreline. He assured them <br />that the County is required to hold several public hearings as well as workshops and send out <br />3 -panel brochures indicating what the potential assessments will be should there be <br />assessments. It is staff's intent that everyone be well-informed on exactly what the funding <br />scenarios and formulae are. <br />Chairman Macht thought a simple flow -chart would be helpful so everyone knows <br />approximately what will be discussed and when it will be discussed. He thought this might <br />dispel the fear that the Board is "rushing into something" before people have a chance to <br />understand and respond to it. This timetable should be made available to the press so <br />everyone might be relieved. <br />Vice Chairman Adams thought that perhaps Phases 1 and 2 ought to have been rolled <br />together. <br />Commissioner Tippin stressed there was a hard-working committee and consultants. <br />He had some very specific opinions, but thought the orderly thing is to have public <br />workshops. He commented that his philosophy on beach renourishment has not changed in <br />many years. He pointed out that just because the Board does not have a fight here every <br />week does not mean that they have locked their brain or are not studying the Plan. He <br />predicted things would sort out and be very fair. He agreed that publication of information <br />was necessary to keep the public informed. <br />From her biology background, Commissioner Stanbridge could see the process <br />evolving and felt it would have a way of working itself out. She suggested that the Board <br />add "patience" to their invocation each week; she felt it was needed in order to get through <br />this whole phasing. <br />FEBRUARY 9, 1999 <br />41 <br />BOOK FAGE 314 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.