My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2/9/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
2/9/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:55 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:20:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
02/09/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 108 PAGE -3h <br />Commissioner Ginn thought this was a delicate subject, especially if you are getting <br />billed for it. She asked Mr. Tabar for a checklist of items the Board would have to go <br />through prior to a special assessment. <br />Mr. Tabar repeated that he will furnish a flow chart to the Board and the consultants <br />have prepared an implementation procedure for special assessments which lists exactly what <br />public hearings are necessary and any notices that would need to be sent to anyone that <br />would be in an area of assessment. He had given this to Mr. Glynn last week. <br />Commissioner Ginn asserted that there is no one on the Board who is not in favor of <br />going ahead with the beach renourishment, but the problem is who pays for it. <br />Public Works Director James Davis wanted to comment that the methodology the <br />consultant is using to segregate the storm protection benefit and the recreation benefit is a <br />methodology that the State of Florida will heavily consider when the County applies for State <br />funding. Therefore, the methodology is important to the integrity of the funding plan. The <br />problem is implementing the methodology is the nature of our community and the locations <br />where recreation occurs. He wanted to be sure the Board realizes that the storm protection <br />benefit and the recreation is not a flawed mythology. He thought the State looks highly at <br />those two issues and we need to make sure that whatever final funding program is decided <br />upon, it at least addresses the State's concern over those two benefit issues. <br />Chairman Macht inquired if this is a prescribed methodology to have State fund <br />sharing, and Director Davis responded that it is what the State looks at heavily when they <br />allocate State money. <br />Vice Chairman Adams advised that we have been in contact with the State for years <br />on the funding mechanisms, so it is not that we have ignored the State or not been in touch <br />with them. <br />11.G.3. CURBING REPLACEMENT IN ROCKRIDGE - <br />CULVERTING THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF <br />TRANSPORTATION 16th STREET DRAINAGE DITCH <br />Public Works Director James Davis briefly reviewed his Memorandum of February <br />8, 1999: _ <br />FEBRUARY 9, 1999 <br />42 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.