My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/9/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
3/9/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:55 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:24:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/09/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 108 PAGE 79 <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />Chairman Macht asked if the conceptual approval were granted today, what was left <br />for modification and to what degree. <br />Director Boling referred to the many conditions set forth in the recommendation and <br />stressed that one of those was working out the 161 Street improvements in a developer's <br />agreement that would come back before the Board for approval. He stated that the location <br />of the school and buffering were included as part of today's conceptual proposal. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge asked if the school is built would it be deed -restricted so <br />they cannot go outside the parameter of the setbacks and easements already established, and <br />Director Boling responded in the affirmative, adding that the School Board would take the <br />property subject to those restrictions and obligations including the buffering conditions. The <br />window of opportunity for the School Board is 2007-2014 which was arrived at between the <br />developer and the School Board staff. <br />Vice Chairman Adams understood that if the School Board did not build a school, the <br />property would revert to recreational/open space, and Director Boling confirmed her <br />understanding and added that it cannot be a church site. <br />Commissioner Tippin commented that he helped write the restrictions in 1985 and he <br />is very conservative. As a member of the Regional Planning Council he resisted this new <br />TND concept, because it is quite a drastic change. He has gone to visit some of these already <br />established TNDs in other locations and he admitted to having changed his viewpoint. This <br />is different and somewhat scary, but he would support this request. <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Tippin, SECONDED <br />BY Commissioner Adams, to approve the concept, which <br />includes the rezoning, with the understanding that the 16' Street <br />situation will be seriously revisited. <br />Commissioner Tippin suggested that the Board consider moving the canal and/or <br />curving the road. <br />Under discussion, Vice Chairman Adams found it interesting that there was only one <br />sticking point. She complimented staff on their efforts and commented that this TND is <br />getting back to the basics of a neighborhood. She predicted it would be fun to watch it <br />MARCH 9, 1999 <br />58 <br />0 it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.