My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/23/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
3/23/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2018 12:37:07 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:27:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/23/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 108 FAGS 7JO <br />9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE 99-010 - FALSE ALARM <br />ORDINANCE <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR BEARING <br />IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br />The Board reviewed the proposed ordinance which had been discussed at the table <br />previously. <br />Sandy Shields, a planner with the Sheriff's Office, advised the alarm ordinance had <br />been modeled after one that the Model States Program had provided. They invited input <br />from both local and state alarms companies and had changed sections in accordance with <br />some of their recommendations. The draft was brought before the Legislative Committee <br />of the Chamber of Commerce and the changes they suggested were incorporated into the <br />draft presented to the Board of County Commissioners about a month ago. <br />Ms. Shields then responded to questions of Commissioner Adams concerning the <br />proposed ordinance advising that changes recommended by the Commissioners were inserted <br />in the proposed ordinance. These changes included putting in the initial registration and <br />renewal fee of $30. The renewal fee will be waived if there are no false alarms in a year. <br />The makeup of the board and how it will be convened have been changed. Also, it <br />has been clarified that the ordinance will be administered by the Sheriff's Office. She also <br />identified the types of responses which shall be determined to be a false alarm. <br />Commissioner Ginn was concerned about Section 18, Violations, and the $500 fine, <br />which seemed very steep to her. <br />Ms. Shields responded that Section 18 was put in as a "catch-all" for any items not <br />addressed elsewhere in the new ordinance. The rest of the ordinance speaks about licensed <br />alarm companies; there is an issue of unlicensed alarm companies that are practicing in the <br />county. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. There being none, he closed the public hearing. <br />MARCH 23, 1999 <br />24 <br />• • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.