My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/13/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
4/13/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�, <br />BOCK 0 3 F'AG� `� � <br />rushed so that we get bad data. She suggested a dollar limit on the per diem for bad weather; <br />she felt it could be determined in advance when the weather would keep them from working. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge expressed her concern about locating and identifying <br />culturaMHstorical artifacts as well as environmental assessments. She inquired whether the <br />consultants would be calling in others with expertise in that field and thought those costs <br />should be anticipated. <br />Mr. Tabar advised that such a study would be required during the permitting process. <br />Chairman Macht recalled the City of Vero Beach had done an archeology survey <br />when the original investigations were done, perhaps 1988. <br />Commissioner Adams inquiredhowthe offshore targetpriorities are defined, and Mr. <br />Tabar advised that every bit of information available was used, including prior <br />documentation and studies, navigational charts, and PEP Reef investigative materials. <br />Quality of sand is one of the most important aspects of the beach restoration project. <br />Commissioner Adams wanted an idea of the additional costs whichmight occurunder <br />Task 1.2 "if necessary" and costs formagnetometer surveys mentioned in Task 1.9. She also <br />felt it was important to know what requirements DEP would place on the process. In the <br />final sentence of Task 3.3, she wanted added presentations to the Beach & Shore <br />Preservation Advisory Committee and workshops. She reiterated her concern about the <br />almost doubling of the costs for this contract and cautioned that if it is so costly in the <br />beginning stages, the ultimate costs of the project need to be considered. <br />Commissioner Ginn reiterated her request for more information about the sub - <br />consultants listed on backup page 150. She was looking for assurances that these sub - <br />consultants had experience in this work. <br />Commissioner Ginn then queried Mr. Tabar on the time schedule of ATM, whether <br />or not they are on time, and if their sub -consultants have agreed to the schedule. _ <br />Mr. Tabar reported that the economic analysis was very recently completed and the <br />data is being processed. An update will be presented to the Beach & Shore Preservation <br />Advisory Committee on April 22�. <br />Commissioner Adams suggested that the Board allow Mr. Tabar to renegotiate by <br />adding Sector 5 and bring it back to the Board. <br />APRIL 13, 1999 <br />0 <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.