My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/13/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
4/13/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:30:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/13/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Coastal Engineer Jeffrey R Tabar reviewed the memorandum and some provisions <br />of the agreement. <br />Commissioner Ginn had read through the full agreement and felt the cost increase <br />was justified with the increased scope of work. She had questions on the contract regarding <br />the Geotechnical Reporting and its compatibility with the County's GIS system and <br />suggested the consultant attend all the County's public hearings and workshops. Under <br />Section X.A., she suggested the work be turned in to the County Coastal Engineer "within <br />one month". Under Section XIV, she felt the contractor should be required to provide the <br />County with their sub -contractors' resumes andexperience to give a higher level of comfort. <br />She felt the time -line was very ambitious but perhaps it can be done. She wanted to make <br />sure the Consultant would go through the City of Vero Beach's files. She asked if there <br />would be a limit on pumping distances and the shoal offshore. <br />Mr. Tabar advised that the Federal waters start at the 3 -mile limit and it is possible <br />to bring that sand in. Unfortunately, it is more expensive to bring it that distance and the <br />Federal government would also charge for the sediment taken beyond the 3 -mile limit. He <br />felt from his research that we have adequate sand within the 3 -mile limit to assist us not only <br />in the initial construction, but also in some of the re -nourishment. <br />Commissioner Adams was very concerned with the contract cost and the ultimate cost <br />of the entire project. She was also concerned with what DEP might require. She noted that <br />adding Sector 7 did not add much to the cost. She thought Sector 5 should also be added. <br />Commissioner Ginn thought Sector 5 was included under Task 3.1 in the proposed <br />contract. After Commissioner Adams explained, Commissioner Ginn agreed that Sector 5 <br />needed to be added. <br />Commissioner Adams went on to voice her specific concerns with the contract and <br />estimated it might cost another $150,000. She asked if, when it was finished, they would <br />have the design criteria to put out an RFP for the pumps. <br />Mr. Tabar responded that when the pre -engineering report is finished, the last task <br />would include all necessary documentation to file permits. It would not get us to the point <br />of construction, but will give all the backup data necessary to apply for DEP and ACOE <br />permits. There would be additional costs for a final design following permit review and <br />comments. <br />Commissioner Adams had additional questions about specific parts of the contract, <br />to which Mr. Tabar responded. She felt the time -line was aggressive, but did not want it <br />APRIL 139 1999 <br />37 <br />BOOK 10J7 FAH JJ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.