Laserfiche WebLink
enhance water quality and to create beneficial habitat. In fact, some developers have found that <br />required littoral zones become a desirable development amenity from an aesthetic and habitat <br />standpoint. <br />In its latest amendments to the comprehensive plan (May 1998), the county determined that littoral <br />zones should not be required when SJRWMD does not require them. As a result, the county adopted <br />a comprehensive plan policy stating that the county will not require littoral zones when the <br />SJRWMD determines that littoral zones "...are not necessary from the standpoint of water quality". <br />Where projects are exempted from SJRWMD littoral zone requirements, an alternative method or <br />design is approved to ensure water quality. Thus, projects are allowed to use various methods for <br />meeting water quality standards. <br />To implement this new comprehensive plan allowance, the county's current littoral zone <br />requirements need to be modified. The proposed amendment would implement the new <br />comprehensive plan policy by allowing a littoral zone exemption based upon a determination by <br />SJRWMD that the littoral zones are not required. <br />Staff Recommendation: Approve the proposed amendment <br />PSAC Recommendation: Voted (6-0) for the same recommendation as staff <br />PZC Recommendation: Voted (7-0) for the same recommendation as staff <br />9. Wabasso Corridor Plan Requirements Update <br />Background <br />In November 1995, the Board of County Commissioners, by a 3-2 vote, adopted the Wabasso <br />Corridor Plan. The plan presently covers an -area along CR 510 from W Avenue to the Atlantic <br />Ocean, and along US 1 from 811 Street to 95* Street. On December 17, 1996, the Board <br />unanimously adopted an ordinance to codify the Wabasso Corridor Plan special development <br />requirements by incorporating those requirements into the county's land development regulations <br />(LDRS) section 911.18. <br />Recognizing that the Wabasso Corridor Plan would have a positive impact on the community, the <br />Board directed a committee to draft a similar corridor plan for S.R. 60. On April 22, 1997, the Board <br />adopted the S.R. 60 Corridor Plan on a 5-0 vote. As it did with the Wabasso Corridor Plan, the <br />Board adopted an ordinance to codify the S.R. 60 Corridor Plan special development requirements <br />into the county's LDR section 911.19. Besides codifying the S.R. 60 plan requirements, the Board <br />also voted to revise the S.R. 60 Corridor Plan. Those corridor plan revisions were primarily <br />clarifications and modifications identified as necessary during the codification process. <br />Related to corridor plans was an action that the Board took on May 19, 1998. At that time, the Board <br />adopted LDR changes to increase county -wide buffering requirements and landscaping requirements <br />along project roadway frontages. In addition, the county has been proactive in designing roadway. <br />project special landscaping, including the following projects: Wabasso Causeway, I-95/S.R. 60, 581 <br />Avenue, 43`d Avenue, and C.R. 512. <br />Because of all these changes, the Wabasso Corridor Task Force recently revisited the Wabasso <br />Corridor Plan requirements and determined that plan revisions are warranted. In general, the task <br />force determined that many sections and details of the SR 60 Corridor Plan should be added and <br />integrated into the Wabasso Corridor Plan. Over the course of 5 workshop meetings (see attachment <br />#4), the task force reviewed the entire Wabasso Corridor Plan and is recommending, along with staff, <br />the proposed amendments to LDR section 911.18. <br />April 19,1999 <br />0 <br />BOOK 109 PAGE <br />