My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/18/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
5/18/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:56 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:37:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/18/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Larger (in excess of 120 acres) Equestrian Use Agricultural — Planned Developments shall <br />locate lots or primary residential building envelopes within the front (roadside) one-third of an <br />overall parcel size, with the balance of the parcel dedicated to equestrian accessory uses (pastures, <br />paddocks, barns, stables, help living quarters, etc.). <br />Clustered, in the case of Larger Equestrian Developments shall mean and allow primary <br />residential building envelopes or home sites located along access roadways with the overall parcel <br />abutting adjacent similar open parcels) to maximize open, equestrian uses. <br />Attorney O'Haire continued that a conscious decision has been made in this County <br />that high-rises are not the quality or look desired and the applicant believes that the proposal <br />is the most efficient use of the property. This project will be created for people who can <br />afford to live on 5, 10, or 20 -acre tracts. The developer of the project is the one who pays <br />for the infrastructure and those people who live in the high end of the real estate market <br />shoulder most of the tax burden in the County. Larger parcels of land pay higher taxes and <br />higher impact fees. He did not believe a Comp Plan amendment is required for this project <br />but merely a direction to staff with an interpretation of "clustering". <br />George Beuttell, 5000 16' Street, stated that he had developed an agricultural PD <br />and agreed with clustering on a roadway. He felt that staff is trying to jam everyone into a <br />certain spot and prohibit landowners from living on their own larger parcels. He believed <br />that the economics of agriculture determine whether or not the land will continue to be used <br />for agricultural purposes. <br />Commissioner Ginn questioned whether Mr. Beuttell had been required to obtain a <br />Comp Plan amendment when he developed an agricultural PD, and Mr. Beuttell responded <br />that he had not. <br />Discussion followed regarding "mom and pop" operations and small "start up" <br />agricultural endeavors. <br />Commissioner Tippin observed that his daughter is building a home on 10 acres near <br />Bradenton in a subdivision called "Panther Woods". This development is all broken into 5, <br />10 or 20 -acre parcels and most of the purchasers are young families. He also noted that <br />much less land is required today for farming due to pesticides and fertilizers. <br />Mr. Beuttell then noted that allowing larger parcels is really doing society a service <br />as there is much less stress involved when people live farther apart. <br />MAY 189 1999 <br />-47- BOOK Fri F <br />Kid <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.