Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The following alternatives are presented: <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Revise Paragraph 30 , Page 6 of the Original Option <br />Agreement to contain the School District's language. If <br />approved by the Board, this revision would be presented <br />to the seller for concurrence. Proceed to complete the <br />Option terms as required. In addition, approve the <br />attached interlocal agreement with the School District <br />which provides for the School District purchasing a <br />portion of the 25 acre site and establishes a Joint <br />County/School District Facility Committee to coordinate <br />the work. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Declare the Option to be void since the School District <br />will not execute it. <br />RECOMMDATIONS AND FUNDING <br />Alternative No. 1 is recommended. Funding to be from 1C Local <br />Option Sales Tax. <br />Commissioner Grin questioned whetherthe Countyhas an agreementwiththe School <br />Board, and Public Works Director Jim Davis advised that he had spoken with the School <br />Board's attorney who has approved the Interlocal Agreement which establishes that the <br />School Board will purchase a portion of the land from the County if the County closes on <br />the property. <br />Commissioner Adams felt the County would be stuck with the School Board's extra <br />15 acres should they decide they did not want to participate. <br />Commissioner Ginn then questioned whether the title defect would be cured, and <br />Director Davis responded that the problem would be resolved to the County Attorney's <br />satisfaction prior to closing. <br />County Attorney Vitunac noted in Paragraph 2 of the Interlocal Agreement "It is the <br />intent" should read "The School District shall purchase a minimum of 15 acres". There <br />should also be added the language that "they shall do so by 12/31/2000". <br />MAY 18,1999 <br />-63- <br />• <br />BOOK PAGE o <br />