7/13/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission upheld the staff denial because the applicant met none of the LDR criteria that would exempt the project from using street numbers. These criteria are as follows: (4) Named roads.- (a) oads: (a) The requirement of number designations for roads in the unincorporated county shall not apply to named roads established prior to the date of this chapter. (b) All new roads established in the unincorporated county shall be issued a number designation in conformance with the grid pattern as described herein, with the following exceptions: 1. Continuations of existing, named roads (roads with name designations only), or 2. Roads on the barrier island, or 3. Private roads within a planned development or a private subdivision that do not fit into the county's existing grid system of east -west and north -south roads. At the time of development plan application, staff shall apply these criteria in its review of requests for use of road names. Staff determinations shall be final unless appealed pursuant to the provisions of 951.09(2). The applicant is not continuing a named road pattern, and the project is not on the barrier island. The roads within the subdivision can easily fit into the county's overall roadway numbering system, such as was done in the hammock Lake Estates and Cypress Lake PDs located north of this project. Therefore, the applicant should be required to meet the LDR requirements and use the street numbers, such as 540 Avenue and 531d Avenue, which have been assigned to the project by planning staff. Landscape and Buffering: July 13, 1999 West Side Village A (Multi Fmnily): A 50' wide buffer with a 75' setback is proposed along the west side of Village A, where Village A abuts Lateral B Canal and 58'h Avenue. The buffer is proposed to be a Type "B" with a 6' opaque feature. A heavier than normal buffer is required since the developer is proposing multi -family units (limited to 1 & 2 story combinations and a maximum of 3 units attached). Note. The Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concerns about this specific area since it is adjacent to two existing single-family homes located on approximately 10 acres. While the Planning and Zoning Commission made no specific recommendation regarding this interface, it directed staff to work with the applicant to "beef -up" the buffer. - Staff has meet with the applicant and examined Bringing the proposed lake south to Oslo Road and changing the product type to single-family units along this property line. The applicant has indicated that he wants to proceed with the buffer as proposed at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and has included colorized 53