Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br />Based on the proposals which were submitted in response to the RFP, the committee unanimously <br />recommended, and the Board approved, that The Gehring Group provide the consultant services at <br />a cost of $30,000 to be paid in 12 equal monthly installments. <br />Mr. Kurt Gehring, President of The Gehring Group signed a "Consultant's Certificatio- W' (see <br />attached) included in the RFP, which states his firm is not engaged in the sale of insurance products. <br />It has been recently discovered, however, that The Gehring Group does sell insurance products. <br />Recommendation <br />Based on the written opinion of the County Attorney (see attached memo dated July 1, 1999) and <br />subsequent discussions with him, the committee recommends that the Board terminate the consultant <br />agreement between Indian River County Board of County Commissioners and The Gehring Group <br />effectively immediately. <br />Administrator Chandler summarized the memorandum and reiterated the <br />recommendation to terminate the contract with The Gehring Group. He believed staff could <br />pick up the study based on the work done and bring back a recommendation to the Board by <br />the end of August. <br />Commissioner Ginn indicated she wished to review their report and Administrator <br />Chandler advised that was not on the agenda today as staff had just recently received it and <br />has not had the opportunity to review it. <br />ChairmanMachtwas confused and askedAdministrator Chandlerwhatthe Boardwas <br />being asked to do at this meeting, and Administrator Chandler responded "terminate the <br />contract with The Gehring Group." <br />Commissioner Ginn and Vice Chairman Adams wanted to hear from Mr. Gehring who <br />had requested to speak. <br />Kurt Gehring, 314 in Palm Beach County (sic), came to the meeting to apologize to <br />the Board and to Indian River County. When he received the RFP for contracting services <br />for consultant, there was a paragraph that was confusing as to what the County was looking <br />for with an insurance consultant. He asked Purchasing whether he could offer a proposal if <br />he did not receive any commissions on this particular group, also he put in writing that he <br />would not receive any commissions. He understood it would be okay and he went forward. <br />It was not until later that Mr. Baker noticed that they have agents and consultants on their <br />letterhead that raised the question if they were actually an agent. He clarified that 95% of <br />his business is municipal -based business and he receives a commission on 75% of that on <br />an exclusive agent -of -record basis, meaning no matter where the business went, he received <br />a commission. To him, this was not a conflict of interest. He understood that was the basis <br />July 13, 1999 <br />gOU 1 J J PAGE ��. <br />M <br />LJ <br />