Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />BOOK A0 PAGE 1 <br />9.A. PUBLIC HEARING - REQUEST TO AMEND ZONING <br />ORDINANCE AND ACCOMPANYING ZONING MAP FROM <br />RS -3 AND A-1 TO PD FOR APPROXIMATELY 217.31 ACRES <br />OF LAND GENERALLY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST <br />CORNER OF 58m AVENUE AND 9TH STREET SW (OSLO <br />ROAD, BETWEEN 91H STREET SW AND SOUTH RELIEF <br />CANAL SUNTREE PARTNERS - CITRUS SPRINGS) <br />(CLERK'S NOTE: THIS PUBLIC HEARING WAS CONTINUED FROM THE <br />MEETING OF JULY 139 1999. SEE MINUTES OF MEETING OF JULY 139 1999 <br />FOR PROOF OF PUBLICATION.) <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of July 27, 1999: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DrVlprf HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. eating, AICP <br />Community Development Dirltor <br />FROM: John W. McCoy, AICP:!! AM <br />Senior Planner, Current Development <br />DATE: July 27, 1999 <br />SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Citrus Springs Request for a Rezoning from A-1 and RS -3 <br />to Planned Development (PD) and Conceptual Plan Approval <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of August 3, 1999. <br />At its regular meeting of July 13, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners considered the Citrus <br />Springs PD rezoning and conceptual plan request. That conceptual PD plan proposed 645 residential <br />units on 217 acres with a recreation complex and accessory commercial. The subject property is <br />located at the northeast comer of 9" Street SW (Oslo Road) and 58th Avenue (Kings Highway). <br />At the July 13th meeting, the Board of County Commissioners heard concerns from area residents <br />and expressed their own concerns regarding the design of the conceptual plan. Because of those <br />concerns, the Board of County Commissioners continued the public hearing for the proposed project <br />to August 3, 1999, giving the applicant time to modify his design to address those concerns. The <br />applicant has submitted a modified design. <br />While the overall design layout is similar, with 6 villages, containing 3 separate building types, the <br />applicant has made major changes. These changes are as follows: <br />The applicant has converted the triplex buildings to duplex buildings with increased internal <br />setbacks and provided larger lot sizes. This was done in Villages A and F to address external <br />compatibility issues. <br />AUGUST 3, 1999 <br />-36- <br />