8/3/1999 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• • The applicant has reduced the total number of units proposed from 645 units to 630 units. The reduction in units is spread across Villages A,D,E, and F. This was done as a result of design changes which affect the number of units within the respective villages. • The applicant has reduced the lake area from 50.7 acres to 45.3 acres. This has been done in an effort to provide additional green area, more useable green area, and more visible green area. • The applicant has modified the conceptual plan to provide 10 acres of additional green open - space. This has generally been done by reducing lake area and eliminating some residential buildings. • The applicant has brought the lake south to Oslo Road along the west property line, which provides another physical barrier for the not -included property to the west. Since the original Type "B" buffer has been retained, the addition of the lake increases the setback from 75' to 125'. The setback is measured from the duplex unit to the property line, the distance from structure to structure is actually greater. This has been done to address external compatibility issues. The applicant has modified the setbacks on the 50' wide lots from 0' on one side and 10' on the opposite side to 5' on each side. The pool and patio setbacks on the side have been increased from 2' to 5'. The rear setbacks have been increased from 15' to 25'. The applicant has modified the sideyard setbacks on Village E from 0' on one side and 10' on the opposite side to 7.5' on each side. The applicant has increased the lot width within Village E from 65' to 75'. These are the major changes that the applicant has made to address the concerns that were raised at the July 13, 1999 Board of County Commissioners meeting. In support of the revised conceptual plan, the applicant has submitted a booklet which provides a colorized revised conceptual plan, density analysis, open -space analysis, pictures of existing developments and details on the more intensely developed villages. The staff's original item is attached for informational purposes. Based on the above analysis, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the PD rezoning and conceptual plan with the following conditions: The applicant shall submit full conceptual plan sets consistent with the revised conceptual plan, and 2. All conditions contained in the original staff report shall apply. AUGUST 3, 1999 •