My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/17/1999
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1990's
>
1999
>
8/17/1999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:11:57 PM
Creation date
6/17/2015 12:40:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/17/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. DeBlois responded that staff had recommended that based on the State's <br />recommendation, however MANWAC's recommendation is in the plan. He explained the <br />point at issue is the seasonality of the slow speed restriction outside of the channel. <br />Presently, the slow speed is in effect during manatee season, and out -of -season it is <br />unregulated. The State and Save the Manatee prefer the slow speed year-round. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge stated safe boating is her main concern through that narrow <br />channel because of the amount of boating activity and stabilization of the riverbank. She <br />agreed that slowing large boat speeds might also help as it is very dangerous in that area. <br />Mr. DeBlois pointed out that proposed Policy 1.7, regarding siting of new marinas, <br />in addition to the marina zones (which relate specifically to whether or not to lift the boat - <br />slip ratio of 1 per 100' shoreline) specifically prohibits new marinas in certain places, <br />including the Jungle Trail Narrows. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge thought the plan was very good overall, and would support <br />it except for that one spot which should be considered from a boating -safety standpoint. <br />Vice Chairman Adams believed the County would be "sticking our heads in the sand" <br />if we think the State is going to add law enforcement just by asking. She thought the Board <br />could take an active role in pushing the State to try to get it done, but an immediate solution <br />would be possible only at the county level. She could support an additional fee for <br />boaters/users to pay for more law enforcement on the river. <br />Commissioner Ginn explained MANWAC's objections to an additional fee because <br />boat registration money has been siphoned off into the (State's) general fund and the County <br />is not getting a fair return. Representative Sembler thinks there will be money coming down <br />for as many as 100 Marine Patrol officers. N ANWAC was adamant the Board follow <br />through with contacting our representatives to push for more law enforcement since the <br />agency is now a "conservation commission". <br />Vice Chairman Adams agreed. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge recounted that officers of the Marine Patrol Division had <br />left the agency knowing of the merger. The new executive director will need to decide where <br />the officers will be located. There is a long coastline so we need to make sure locally that <br />we get our fair share of them. The County may be able to encourage a partnership by <br />furnishing a couple of officers and the State furnishing two, which would give us four, three <br />more than we have now. <br />Commissioner Ginn reminded all that the City of Vero Beach has one officer. She <br />AUGUST 17, 1999 <br />46 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.