Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Now we find once again that the County and the College have cemented their plans <br />for the new building, making sure neither to let us know nor to give us any response to our <br />attempts to resolve this matter. <br />It is appalling that the County feels it is good business to ignore its citizens. Every <br />resident of Tndian River County should take notice, Iand perhaps take a page from the <br />civics book used by Frani: Zorc. If you want to do business with the County, or with <br />IRCC, you need to sue them first. <br />We have submitted road changes to your staff and to the College. Jim Davis tells <br />me that he is "working un! his promised road diversion plan. Having gotten no reply from <br />his office regarding a convenient date for returning to the Commission, we are not going to <br />sit and be ignored again. We have paid dearly for being good citizens, and we don't intend <br />that this will continue. August.W. 1999, over two months from our pre'.7ous meeting, <br />►7 <br />should be adequate time for everyone to have made the necessary preparations for the <br />Commission to consider our proposals. <br />Thank you for your attention to this matter. <br />Sincerely, <br />Lynne A. Larkin, Esq. <br />Lynne Larkin, representing the Sixty Oaks homeowners, advised that the concerns <br />of the residents had not been resolved as they had hoped. The residents have been trying to <br />get something done, but the process seems to be going forward without them. She hoped <br />for some oversight by the Board of County Commissioners and suggested they look for <br />"compromise" on both sides. <br />Terry Thompson, Capital Projects Coordinator, gave the history and advised the <br />college's representative was not able to attend this meeting IRCC has said the alternatives <br />offered by the neighbors are not acceptable and do not fit into their future plans if the road <br />is relocated. She pointed out there is a total of 39 feet from the utility easement and the edge <br />of the street. She specified that the Utilities Department wants no permanent structures; a <br />buffer of wax myrtles would be acceptable by the Utilities Department. <br />Vice Chairman Adams preferred the use of a different plant material because wax <br />myrtles do not give a full screening. <br />Ms. Thompson suggested the fence could be moved back and a buffer added and a <br />chain link fence could be installed to address the concerns of trespassing. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out the grid for 16" Street was eliminated when the <br />roadway (18' Street/College Lane) was built. <br />Ms. Thompson specified that a signal will be installed at 18' Street (College Lane) <br />and 581i Street as part of the 581` Avenue improvements. <br />AUGUST 17, 1999 <br />51 <br />• <br />