Laserfiche WebLink
the action or be fined. If the case is taken to criminal court, the penalty is a fine of up -to - <br />$500 and 6 months in jail. <br />Believing that it was inappropriate to put someone in jail for this type of violation, <br />Chairman Macht suggested that revocation of the permit and removal of the pier might be <br />appropriate and a deterrent. <br />County Attorney Vitunac understood the suggestion and Community Development <br />Director Bob Keating advised that staffwould investigate the suggestion and bring back their <br />recommendation at the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge suggested new terminology be used since the words "dock" <br />and "pier" are used interchangeably, and Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement <br />Chief Roland M. DeBlois stated that staff is recommending the term "observation/fishing <br />pier". <br />Chairman Macht concurred with the Task Force and suggested that a sign be affixed <br />saying "No Docking is Permitted". <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Stanbridge, the Board unanimously (4-0, <br />Commissioner Grin absent) scheduled the public hearing date <br />for September 28, 1999, as recommended in the memorandum. <br />11.A.2. AUTHORIZATION TO INITIATE A REQUEST FOR <br />PROPOSALS TO SELECTANAFFORDABLE HOUSINGDEVELOPER <br />TO RECEIVE A STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP <br />(SHIP) FUND SET ASIDE THAT CAN BE USED TO MATCH HOME <br />INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM (HOME)FUNDS <br />The Board reviewed a Memorandum of August 31, 1999: <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />DIVISION HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />Robert M. Keating, AICP <br />Community Development Direct <br />FROM: Sasan Rohani, AICPS -10�. <br />Chief, Long -Range Planning <br />SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 <br />79 <br />