Laserfiche WebLink
CON ..USiON <br />It is stasis position that this proposed amendment to the county's comprehensive plan will enhance <br />the plan. Also, it has been demonstrated that this amendment maintains the plan's internal <br />consistency. Finally, the analysis section addresses DCA's ORC Report objections and comments. <br />For those reasons, staff feels that the proposed amendment should be adopted. <br />RRCOMMFNDATION <br />Based on the analysis conducted, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners <br />approve this proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan by adopting the attached ordinance. <br />Community Development Director Bob Keating explained that this is the final public <br />hearing which has been continued from the September 28' meeting. The changes being <br />proposed are minor with the exception of the changes to the Economic Development portion. <br />The changes to the Coastal Management and Recreation and Open Space elements are just <br />corrections to text and the Future Land Use element is being changed to rename the "mixed <br />use" designation to the "new town" designation. <br />The Chairman re -opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />in this matter. <br />Guy Barber, 1678 Highlands Avenue, questioned whether the backup could be made <br />available to the public, perhaps at the library branches, prior to the meetings. <br />Peter Robinson questioned the change from "mixed use" to "new town", and Director <br />Keating advised that in 1990 when the County was going through the Comprehensive Plan <br />adoption process, an intervenor challenged some provisions of the Plan and a "mixed use" <br />OCTOBER 26, 1999 j <br />-47- BOOK �L.l P,*1 <br />