Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />BOOK GE <br />TO: James E. Chandler <br />County Administrator <br />D TM ,NT HEAD CONCURRENCE: <br />WA <br />ober[ M. Keating, AICP <br />Community Developpm�m►een�nt irecto <br />THROUGH: Roland M. DeBloisl2p <br />Chief, Environmental Planning <br />& Code Enforcement <br />FROM: Kelly Zedek �/ <br />Code Enforcement Officer <br />DATE: 02/22/2000 <br />RE: JOHN A. & ELLEN LLOYD REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF A DRAINAGE <br />& UTILITY EASEMENT ON LOT 3, SEBASTIAN GROVE ESTATES <br />SUBDIVISION (6855 WOODMERE ROAD) <br />It is requested that the data herein presented be given formal consideration by the Board of County <br />Commissioners at its regular meeting of March 7, 2000. <br />DESCRIPTION AND CONDITIONS <br />John and Ellen Lloyd own three contiguous lou (Lots 3, 4, and 5) in Sebastian Grove Estates, <br />located on Woodmere Road near the city limits of Sebastian. The subject property is zoned CH, <br />Heavy Commercial, and the Lloyds are in the process of obtaining approval to build a commercial <br />warehouse/trades building on the combined three lots. To that end, on October 19, 1999, the Board <br />Of County Commissioners approved a release of easements (County Resolution 99-116) that <br />abandoned interior easements on the property (between the three contiguous lots). <br />When the Lloyds initially petitioned the County to release easements on the property, the Lloyds <br />requested that a three foot easement on the eastern perimeter of Lot 3 be abandoned, as well as the <br />interior easements between the three lots. At that time, however, County Engineering and Road & <br />Bridge staff objected to abandonment of the eastern three foot easement, due to an uncertainty of <br />future drainage design needs. Since then, Todd Smith, the Lloyds' engineer for the <br />warehouseltrades building project, has coordinated with County Engineering and Road & Bridge <br />staff, and has resolved staffs concerns via the project's drainage design, whereby the subject <br />easement is no longer needed for drainage purposes. <br />ALTERNATIVES AND ANALYSIS <br />The request has been reviewed by Bell South Communications; Florida Power & Light Corporation; <br />T.C.I. Cable Corporation; the Indian River County Utilities Department; the County Road & Bridge <br />and Engineering Divisions; and the County surveyor. None of the utility providers or reviewing <br />agencies expressed an objection to the requested release of easement. Therefore, it is staff's <br />position that the requested easement release would have no adverse impact to utilities being <br />supplied to the subject properties or to other properties. <br />March 7, 2000 <br />32 <br />