3/21/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. m BOO Not Contravene' letter stating it does not contravene local zoning requirements. Then, after the applicant finishes with DEP, the County will review and issue a building permit, but that just means they meet the criteria of our building codes. To Vice Chairman Ginn, it appeared that DEP's only regulation is that the building must be on pilings. The DEP has virtually approved everything seaward of the 1987 CCCL since 1997 on the list she was provided. She did not know the legislative intent of the law or what has been done under the regulations. She had a problem with the sequence of events when someone wants to build between the two CCCLs. It seemed to her that the County was in a bind with the DEP and suggested perhaps a strong letter should go to the DEP with a copy to the applicant. She had a problem with the sequence of events on a Sea Oaks Dune House Pointe which originally had been single-family and came back from DEP with multi- family approval. Mr. DeBlois thought the example she cited unfortunately contained a typographical error. The project was actually approved by the PZC. Most of the developments he does are single-family and that was one of the exceptions. To illustrate her concerns, Vice Chairman Ginn provided photographs of multi -family construction between the two CCCLs and commented on the critical erosion on the beach side as well as a turnaround entry which will not accommodate a fire engine. She asked that they be made part of the record. (PHOTOS HAVE BEEN PLACED WITH THE BACK UP FOR THE MEETING.) She had concerns that when the building is threatened by the ocean, the Board would have to issue an emergency armoring permit. Chairman Adams asked how far the construction was from the bluff line, and Mr. Tabar estimated it was probably within 40 feet. Vice Chairman Ginn disagreed saying she thought it was 30 feet at the most. Mr. Tabar believed there were certainly some inherent problems with the DEP review. March 21, 2000 122