Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />The procedures for reviewing comprehensive plan amendments involve several steps. First, the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission, as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to <br />review the request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of or deny any associated rezoning request. If <br />the rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, <br />unless the denial to rezone is appealed. <br />Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, theBoard of County Commissioners conducts <br />two public hearings. The first of those hearings is for a preliminary decision on the land use <br />amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the land use amendment <br />warrants transmittal to DCA for fiuther consideration. A Board of County Commissioners decision <br />not to transmit the land use amendment to DCA constitutes denial of both the land use amendment <br />and rezoning requests. <br />If the land use amendment is transmitted, DCA conducts a review which includes soliciting <br />comments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, several state agencies, and <br />neighboring local governments. After its review, DCA compiles its objections, if it has any, in an <br />Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report, and transmits that report to the <br />county. After staff addresses any issues that were raised in the ORC Report, the second and final <br />Board of County Commissioners public hearing is conducted. The Board takes final action to <br />approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests at that time. If the Board approves <br />the requests, the effective date of the adoption ordinances is when the land use amendment is found <br />"in compliance" by DCA. <br />The Board of County Commissioners is now to decide whether or not to adopt the proposed land use <br />designation and zoning for both subject properties. <br />Subject Property 1. <br />Subject Property 1 and properties to the east and south are zoned RS -3 and are part of a 40 acre citrus <br />grove. Land along Subject Property 1's west boundary is zoned RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential <br />District (up to 6 units/acre), and consists of undeveloped upland habitat and possibly some <br />jurisdictional wetlands. North of Subject Property 1, land is zoned MED and consists of medical <br />office buildings and Indian River Memorial Hospital. <br />Subject Property 2 <br />Subject Property 2 and land to the north and west are zoned MED and part of the Indian River <br />Memorial Hospital Campus. Subject Property 2 consists of stormwater management tracts for that <br />campus. Adjacent land to the east is also zoned MED. That land consists of a medical office <br />building and undeveloped wetlands. <br />Land to the south of Subject Property 2 is zoned RS -3 to the east and RM -3 to the west. The RS -3 <br />area contains subdivisions of single-family homes and a golf course. The RM -3 area contains the <br />Baptist Retirement Center assisted living facility. <br />APRIL 49 2000 <br />-59- BOOR <br />