4/4/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I 0 As mandated in Future Land Use Element Policy 1. 17, county land development regulations contain standards for commercial/industrial development. Those standards limit the intensity of commercial/industrial development throughout the county. Therefore, through Future Land Use Element Policy 1.17, the county has intensity standards for commercial/industrial development. Because any commercial /industrial development on either subject property would be subject to those standards, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.17. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20 states that nodes shall have a designated size based on the intended use, service area population, existing land use pattern and other demand characteristics. The amount of C/I designated land is based on service area population, the existing land use pattern, and other demand characteristics. The proposed amendment will not alter the amount of CA designated land. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.20. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.22 states that 70% of the land area of a node should be developed with non-residential and non-agricultural uses before that node is considered for expansion. The intent of this policy is to regulate increases in the amount of C/I designated land. Since the proposed amendment does not increase2�o a veloped standard doamount of CA es designated aPP1Y to this land in the subject mendmenFuture Land Use Element Policy Future Land Use Element Policy 1.24 Future Land Use Element Policy 1.24 specifically allows the Bd County eno Commissioners to initiate a land use designation amendment to change C/I designated ed land, provided that the following conditions exist: • The parcel has been redesignated to CIL Commercial/Industrial, since comprehensive plan adoption on February 13,1990; and • The parcel is. currently designated C/I; and • More than two years have passed since approval of the ordinance redesignating the parcel to C/I; and • No construction activity has commenced on the parcel since approval of the ordinance redesignating the parcel to CA. If the proposed amendment is adopted, and if no construction activity takes place on Subject property 1 within the referenced time frames, Policy 1.24 would apply and the Board could initiate an amendment to change Subject Property 1 back to a residential designation. APRIL 49 2000