My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
4/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 4:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />• <br />1. Size of Area to be Rezoned: <br />2. Existing Zoning District: <br />3. Proposed Zoning District: <br />4. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Existing Zoning District: <br />5. Most Intense Use of Subject Property <br />Under Proposed Zoning District: <br />BOOK M PAGE <br />f40 acres <br />RS -6, Single -Family Residential District (up to 6 <br />units/acre) <br />RM -6, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to <br />6 units/acre) <br />240 Single -Family Units <br />240 Single -Family Units <br />As per section 910.07(2) of the Concurrency Management Chapter of the County's LDRs, projects <br />which do not increase density or intensity of use are exempt from concurrency requirements. This <br />rezoning request is exempt from concurrency review because the requested zoning would not <br />increase the allowed density of the site. <br />Because the most intense use of the property will not increase, changing the property's zoning from <br />RS -6 to RM -6 will not create additional impacts on any concurrency facilities. In this case, a <br />detailed concurrency analysis will be done in conjunction with any new development on site. That <br />concurrency analysis will address facility service levels and demand. <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and <br />industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes <br />throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the comprehensive plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are <br />important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular <br />applicability for this request are the following objectives and policies. <br />Future Land Use Element Policies 1.11 and 1.12 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.12 states that the L-2, Low -Density Residential -2, land use <br />designation is intended for residential uses with densities up to 6 units/acre. In addition, Future Land <br />Use Element Policy 1.11 states that these residential uses must be located within the urban service <br />area <br />Since the subject property is located within an area designated as L-2 on the county's future land use <br />plan map and is located within the county's urban service area, and the proposed zoning district <br />would allow residential uses no greater than the 6 units/acre permitted by the L-2 designation, the <br />proposed request is consistent with Policies 1.11 and 1.12. <br />April 11, 2000 <br />34 <br />43 <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.