My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
4/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 4:02:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOOK 7 �..ci PAGE 45 <br />Street, SW; 9' Street, SW; and 27`h Avenue) and vegetative buffers and opaque features <br />where they abut single-family zoning districts. <br />• Multiple -family projects must go through the site planning process. Through that process <br />potential impacts can often be mitigated by site design such as the placement of buildings, <br />parldng areas, open space, stormwater management areas, and landscaping. <br />For these reasons, staff feels the requested zoning district would be compatible with adjacent <br />residential development. <br />Environmental protection regulations for the subject property are the same under both the existing <br />RS -6 and the requested RM -6 zoning districts. In either case, the county's 10115% set aside <br />requirement applies to native upland plant communities on site. The isolated wetlands on the site <br />are protected by federal, state and local regulations. If an environmental survey indicates that listed <br />species live on the site, federal and state regulations apply. For these reasons, no adverse <br />environmental impacts associated with this request are anticipated. <br />Based on the analysis, staff has determined that the requested zoning district is compatible with <br />surrounding areas, is consistent with the comprehensive plan, meets all concurrency criteria, will <br />have no negative impacts on environmental quality, and meets all applicable rezoning criteria. Most <br />importantly, the subject property is located in an area deemed suited for multiple -family residential <br />uses. For these reasons, staff supports the request. <br />Based on the analysis, staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the Board <br />of County Commissioners approve this request to rezone the subject property from RS -6 to RM -6 <br />by adopting the attached ordinance. <br />1. Rezoning Application <br />2. Summary Page <br />3. Approved Minutes of the March 9, 2000, Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting <br />4. Rezoning Ordinance <br />April 11, 2000 <br />36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.