Laserfiche WebLink
r-�: 16 '1BOOK Jj 9 VALE � Lu <br />Following the presentation, Director Boling responded to concerns of Commissioners <br />including the conservation easement, the canal system options, stormwater management, <br />staff's recommendation for numbering the interior roadways, buffering, and the option for <br />a road over the canal. <br />Commissioner Macht recommended the developer be able to name the interior <br />roadways and wanted the policy to be addressed during the land development regulation <br />(LDR) amendment process in the near future. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn agreed that the developer should be able to name the interior <br />roadways especially since the curving roadways would not fit into the established grid <br />system. She also was concerned about buffering and wanted to see type "C" buffering or <br />the equivalent along the entire western border. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be <br />heard in this matter. <br />David Knight, of Knight and McGuire, appeared for the developers. He stated the <br />applicant agreed with all the staff recommendations except the numbering of interior <br />roadways and stated the reasons. As to the buffering on the western border, the developer <br />wishes to intermix the buffering with the golf course design itself. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn stated she was looking for some additional buffering but thought <br />that would be okay. <br />It was determined that no one else wished to be heard and the Chairman closed the <br />public hearing. <br />June 20, 2000 <br />78 <br />