My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
On March 19, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners voted 4 to 0 redesignate the subject <br />property from L-2, Low -Density Residential -2 (up to 6 units/acre), to M-1, Medium -Density <br />Residential -1 (up to 8 units/acre); and to rezone the site from A-1, Agricultural District (up to 1 <br />unit/5 acres), to RM -8, Multiple -Family Residential District (up to 8 unitstacre). On May 13, 1999, <br />the Planning and Zoning Commission granted site plan approval for a 153 unit multiple -family <br />project on the subject property. On April 11, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners extended <br />the expiration date of that site plan approval to May 13, 2001. That site plan has not yet been <br />released for construction. <br />Although the number of plan amendments that a local government may consider is not limited, the <br />frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is regulated by state <br />law. According to Florida Statutes, plan amendments are limited to twice per calendar year. For that <br />reason, the county accepts general plan amendment applications only during the `window" months <br />of January and July. In this case, the subject application was one of four applications submitted <br />during the January 2000 window. <br />The procedures for reviewing comprehensive plan amendments involve several steps. First, the <br />Planning and Zoning Commission, as the Local Planning Agency, conducts a public hearing to <br />review the request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning <br />and Zoning Commission may recommend approval of or deny any associated rezoning request. If <br />the rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, <br />unless the denial to rezone is appealed <br />Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board of County Commissioners conducts <br />two public hearings. The first of those hearings is for a preliminary decision on the land use <br />amendment request. At that hearing, the Board determines whether or not the land use amendment <br />warrants transmittal to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for further <br />consideration. A Board of County Commissioners decision not to transmit the land use amendment <br />to DCA constitutes denial of both the land use amendment and rezoning requests. <br />If the land use amendment is transmitted, DCA conducts a review which includes soliciting <br />comments from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, several state agencies, and <br />neighboring local governments. After its review, DCA compiles its objections, if it has any, in an <br />Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) Report, and transmits that report to the <br />county. After staff addresses any issues that were raised in the ORC Report, the second and final <br />Board of County Commissioners public hearing is conducted. The Board takes final action to <br />approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests at that time. If the Board approves <br />the requests, the effective date of the adoption ordinances is when the land use amendment is found <br />"in compliance" by DCA. <br />Planning and 7.oning Cnmmiscion Action <br />On May 11, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 6 to 0 to take the following actions: <br />1) Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners deny this request to redesignate the <br />subject property; and <br />2) Deny the request to rezone the subject property. <br />JULY 119 2000 <br />-106- <br />QK 114 PG 122 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.