My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drainage <br />All developments are reviewed for compliance with county stormwater regulations which require <br />on-site retention, preservation of floodplain storage and minimum finished floor elevations. In <br />addition, development proposals must meet the discharge requirements of the county Stormwater <br />Management Ordinance. Since the site is located within the M-1 Drainage Basin and the Indian <br />River Farms Water Control District (IRFWCD), development on the property will be prohibited <br />from discharging any runoff in excess of two inches in a twenty-four hour period, which is the <br />approved IRFWCD discharge rate. <br />In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property <br />does not lie within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. <br />With the most intense use of this site under the proposed amendment, the maximum area of <br />impervious surface would be approximately 387,684 square feet, or 8.9 acres. The maximum runoff <br />volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given <br />the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 491,966 cubic feet. In order <br />to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain <br />approximately 362,883 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject <br />property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 69.28 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staffs analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site <br />discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and <br />requiring retention of the 362,883 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />Recreation <br />Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development. Therefore, this <br />comprehensive plan amendment request would not be required to satisfy recreation concurrency <br />requirements. <br />Concurrency Summary <br />Based on the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including drainage, roads, solid waste, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed land use designation. <br />While all services and facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate the most intense use of the <br />subject property under the proposed land use designation, this positive concurrency test is not an <br />indication that the subject property is appropriate for commercial development. <br />Passing the concurrency test justifies the proposed land use amendment only if the proposed land <br />use designation is consistent with all other comprehensive plan policies and compatible with <br />surrounding areas. In Indian River County, available capacity for services does not dictate <br />development patterns; rather, the comprehensive plan dictates the location of services. <br />Land use amendment requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the Comprehensive <br />Plan. As per section 800.07(1) ofthe County Code, the "Comprehensive Plan may only be amended <br />in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to Section 163.3177(2), <br />F.S." Amendments must also show consistency with the overall designation of land uses as depicted <br />JULY 119 2000 SK 114 PG 12 <br />-110- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.