My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />on the Future Land Use Map, which includes agricultural, residential, recreational, conservation, <br />public, and commercial and industrial land uses and their densities. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan which identify actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development related decisions—including plan amendment decisions. While <br />all Comprehensive Plan policies are important, some have more applicability than others in <br />reviewing plan amendment requests. <br />Of particular applicability to this land use plan amendment request are the goal, objectives and <br />policies identified below. As indicated in the following analysis, the proposed amendment is not <br />consistent with plan amendment criteria, is not consistent with the objective of establishing a <br />residential/commercial corridor along SR 60, will encourage speculation and discourage infill <br />development, and discourages the compatibility of adjacent land uses. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3 <br />The most important policy to consider in evaluating a plan amendment request for consistency with <br />the county's Comprehensive Plan is Future Land Use Element Policy 14.3. This policy requires that <br />at least one of four criteria be met in order to approve a land use amendment request. These criteria <br />are: <br />• the proposed amendment will correct a mistake in the approved plan; <br />• the proposed amendment will correct an oversight in the approved plan; <br />• the proposed amendment involves a swap or reconfiguration of land uses at separate sites, <br />and that swap or reconfiguration will not increase the overall land use density or intensity <br />depicted on the Future Land Use Map; or <br />• the proposed amendment is warranted based on a substantial change in circumstances <br />affecting the subject property. <br />Staffs position is that this land use amendment request does not meet any of the criteria of Future <br />Land Use Element Policy 14.3. <br />When the current Comprehensive Plan was approved on February 13, 1990, and updated as part of <br />the county's Evaluation and Appraisal Process on March 17, 1998, the plan assigned commercial <br />uses to commercial/industrial nodes. Those nodes were designated various sizes to reflect <br />commercial demand and were established in certain areas to incorporate lands deemed suitable for <br />commercial development. The subject property was considered for inclusion in the node at those <br />times. <br />When the comprehensive plan was adopted and recently updated, the subject property was not <br />included in the node for the following reasons: <br />• There was already sufficient land designated commercial/industrial to accommodate <br />projected demand; <br />• It was determined that including the site in the commercial/industrial node would produce <br />a stip commercial development pattern along 58" Avenue. The county discourages that type <br />of development pattern; <br />• Given the shape (rectangular) and location (surrounded on three sides by residentially <br />designated property) of the subject property, it was determined that including the site in the <br />commercial/industrial node would adversely impact nearby residential areas; and <br />JULY 119 2000 <br />-111- <br />BK 1 14 PG 1 2 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.