My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/11/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
7/11/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:18 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:41:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/11/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comnrehem.dve Plan Am ndm nt Review Prorpdures <br />The state allows local governments to use alternative adoption procedures for "small scale" plan <br />amendments that meet certain criteria. Section 163.3187(1)(c) of the Florida Statutes sets the <br />following criteria for small scale amendments; <br />1. The proposed amendment involves 10 or fewer acres; <br />2. The cumulative effect of the acreage for all small scale amendments in the jurisdiction does <br />not exceed 80 acres in a calendar year, <br />3. The proposed amendment does not involve the same property granted a land use designation <br />change within the prior 12 months; <br />4. The proposed amendment does not involve the same owner's property within 200 feet of <br />property granted a land use designation change within the prior 12 months; <br />5. The proposed amendment does not involve a change to the comprehensive plan's text; <br />6. The subject property is not within an area of critical state concern; and <br />7. The proposed amendment does not involve increasing residential density above 10 unitsiacre <br />Small scale plan amendments are deemed to have fewer impacts than typical plan amendments and <br />are eligible for a streamlined adoption process. In contrast to typical plan amendments which require <br />review and approval by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), local governments <br />may adopt small scale plan amendments without review or approval by DCA. <br />In this case, the procedures for reviewing the subject comprehensive plan amendment will be as <br />follows. First, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducts a public hearing to review the <br />request. The Commission has the option to recommend approval or denial of the comprehensive <br />plan amendment request to the Board of County Commissioners. Also, the Planning and Zoning <br />Commission may recommend approval of or deny the rezoning portion of the request. If the <br />rezoning request is denied, only the land use amendment request is forwarded to the Board, unless <br />the denial to rezone is appealed. Following Planning and Zoning Commission action, the Board <br />takes final action to approve or deny the land use amendment and rezoning requests. <br />Besides being exempt from DCA review, small scale amendments are also exempt from the state's <br />statutory limitations on the frequency of adopting comprehensive plan amendments. For example, <br />although the number of standard plan amendments that a local government may consider is not <br />limited, the frequency with which local governments can amend their comprehensive plan is <br />regulated by state law. According to Florida Statutes, standard plan amendments are limited to twice <br />per calendar year. For that reason, the county accepts standard plan amendment applications only <br />during the two `window" months of January and July. All requests submitted during each window <br />month are processed simultaneously. That method ensures that standard plan amendments will be <br />adopted no more than twice per calendar year. <br />State law, however, provides several exceptions to the twice per calendar year limitation. One of <br />those exceptions is for small scale plan amendments. Consequently, a local government may adopt <br />small scale amendments, such as the subject plan amendment, without regard for the twice per <br />calendar year limitation. For that reason, the proposed amendment is exempt from the twice per <br />calendar year adoption limit. <br />JULY 119 2000 <br />-65- <br />RK 114 PG 08 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.