Laserfiche WebLink
Number of employees, <br />Number of acres, or <br />Number of holes <br />Since ITE does not provide trip rates for golf courses using the independent variable of parking <br />spaces, the county's TIF consultant recommended that the county use acres as the independent <br />variable for golf courses. Subsequent to ordinance adoption with the golf course rate based on <br />acreage, staff encountered problems in assessing golf course TIF's. <br />The principal problem with using acreage to assess golf course TIF's is that there is significant <br />variation in acreage for golf courses with the same number of holes. Since many golf course <br />projects in Indian River County have substantial acreage that is being used for conservation rather <br />than golf course operation purposes, the acreage TIF approach often results in a TIF rate that over- <br />charges golf courses. Staffs position is that a better unit of measure is needed that more closely <br />corresponds to actual trip generation and attraction. <br />In regard to the appropriate unit of measure for golf course TIFs, staff coordinated with the <br />consultant who prepared the traffic impact fee ordinance study. As indicated in the attached letter <br />dated March 17, 2000, the consultant recommends that the county revise its ordinance to use number <br />of holes to determine the TIF for golf courses. It is the consultant's opinion that the number of golf <br />holes is the most accurate measure of the traffic impact of a golf course project. <br />The purpose of amending the county's traffic impact fee ordinance is to ensure that persons affected <br />by the ordinance are assessed a fair fee and receive a proportional benefit from that fee. Staffs <br />position is that number of holes is a better representation of the impact of a golf course development <br />on the county roadways than is acreage. For that reason, staff supports an amendment to the <br />ordinance to assess golf course projects based on $3.801/hole instead of $702/acre. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />With respect to this amendment to the traffic impact fee ordinance, the Board has two basic <br />alternatives. These are: <br />To deny the proposal and maintain the existing traffic impact fee ordinance method of <br />assessing new golf course developments; or <br />To adopt the proposed amendment to assess new golf course development based upon the <br />number of course holes. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners amend the Indian River County traffic <br />impact fee payment schedule for golf courses and amend Chapter 953 to create a separate subsection <br />for the TIF benefit districts and payment schedule. <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. Letter dated March 17, 2000 from consultant Robert P. Wallace <br />'_. Proposed LDR Amendment Ordinance <br />3. PSAC Minutes (DRAFT) <br />4. PZC Minutes (DRAFT) <br />July 189 2000 <br />21 <br />