7/18/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

analysis section of this report. The Planning and Zoning Commission considered the modified proposal at its June 22, 2000 meeting and voted 6-0 to recommend that the Board adopt the proposed change. The Board is now to review the formal amendment and is to adopt, adopt with modifications, or deny the proposed LDR amendment. In addition to the LDR amendment, the Board needs to decide whether or not to establish and appoint a north barrier island CR 510 & SR A -1-A corridor task force. ANALYSIS The proposed special regulations were formulated through meetings with the CR 510 East Corridor Committee and the Wabasso Corridor Task Force, and have already been reviewed in concept by the Board of County Commissioners. Five of the seven special regulations are aspects of the adopted SR 60 Corridor regulations that have not been incorporated into the overall Wabasso Corridor requirements. The committee and task force have expressed support for the proposed amendments, and the Board has conceptually expressed support. The proposed LDR amendment would establish additional special corridor regulations to a sub -area of the existing Wabasso Corridor Plan area. The overall corridor covers an area running north/south along both sides of US #1 from 95* Street to 771h Street and along both sides of CR 510 from 66'ti Avenue to the ocean (see attachment #3). The proposed amendment would affect only sites or portions of sites lying within 300' of the center line of CR 510, east of US #1 (see attachment #4). The 300' from centerline depth of the sub -area was determined to be the area of primary visual impact from CR 510, within which most new free-standing signs, front buffers, new buildings, and development out parcels would be located. Therefore, the committee and task force determined that special regulations within this sub -area would have a significant positive impact on the appearance of the CR 510 corridor east of US 1. Within the CR 510 east corridor, the following special regulations would apply if the proposed LDR amendment is adopted. a. Real Estate Signs would continue to be allowed under the countywide real estate sign maximum size, number, and height restrictions (see attachment W. However, the amendment proposes to place a 15 day limitation on the duration of real estate sign display after the closing. Originally, staff proposed a 30 day timeframe. However, at the May 18'" meeting there was a consensus from development and real estate professionals that a 15 day timeframe would be appropriate and adequate. Therefore, based upon input from the May 18m joint meeting, the LDR amendment now contains a 15 day timeframe. See attachment #5 for a similar (30 day) provision in the Port Orange land development code. b. Special CR 510 buffer for multi -family and planned development projects would require landscaping and an opaque feature 6'- 8' tall (adapted from SR 60 Corridor regulations). C. Log cabins would be prohibited east of the west shore of the Indian River Lagoon. This prohibition item is adapted from SR 60 Corridor regulations. d. Gas station, drive-through, and car wash canopy fascia restrictions would be applied to limit the fascia height of canopies that are located closer than 75' to CR 510. These restrictions are adapted from SR 60 Corridor regulations. July 18, 2000 32 I