Laserfiche WebLink
owners, yet only 4 of the owners had signed the petition. Tri Partners, L.L.C. ( Mr. <br />Cooksey) has purchased most of the properties, and wants to buy more, so Tri Partners <br />accounts for 7 of -the 12 signatures. In the same memo, it states that the two developers (Tri <br />Partners and MacMillan) were required to pave a portion of 10'` Street SW. Her property <br />will not derive any benefit from the paving of all of 10'' Street SW. 4) She described in <br />detail how the method of determining each property's assessment was based on square <br />footage and felt it was very unfair. If the assessment was based on total front footage, which <br />is an option under the County's Code, her assessment would drop from $7,072.07 to <br />$2,357.36. She again questioned why she was being assessed for paving that Mr. Cooksey <br />was required to do in order to develop and open his Amoco Station. She pointed out that the <br />widening of the road was for his direct benefit. She also had discovered that Lot 1 of Tri <br />Partner's property was not included in the assessment. While they would like to have 19& <br />Avenue SW paved, she asked that the assessment be fair . She questioned the "public <br />welfare" referred to in the resolution and urged the Board to deny the resolution and look for <br />a fairer method of assessment. <br />Byron Cooksey, of Tri Partners, L.L.C., shared the concerns of the other property <br />owners, but pointed out that the paving needed to be done and Tri Partners had fronted the <br />money. He described the need for paving 10'hStreet SW to allow 18 wheel trucks to turn <br />around and avoid impacting the school district nearby. The area is being revitalized and the <br />assessment can be determined in more than one way. He wanted to work with every <br />property owner in the area to ensure that it is a beautiful area. Some of the area's property <br />owners have indicated to him that their property value has gone up since he has begun <br />developing the property. He pointed out that their costs on the first phase of the developer's <br />agreement had come in 25% less than estimated, which became a savings to the County. He <br />was also interested in saving money. He thought everyone in the area derived benefit from <br />August 15, 2000 <br />59 <br />OK 1 14 PG 594 <br />• <br />I <br />