My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
8/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:19 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:48:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In this case, the minimum floor elevation level of service standards do not apply, since the property <br />does not he within a floodplain. However, both the on-site retention and discharge standards apply. <br />With the most intense use of this site under the proposed zoning district, the maximum area of <br />impervious surface would be approximately 255,784 square feet, or 5.9 acres. The maximum runoff <br />volume, based on that amount of impervious surface and the 25 year/24 hour design storm, and given <br />the IRFWCD two inch discharge requirement, would be approximately 231,927 cubic feet. In order <br />to maintain the county's adopted level of service, the applicant would be required to retain <br />approximately 179,639 cubic feet of runoff on-site. With the soil characteristics of the subject <br />property, it is estimated that the pre -development runoff rate is 19.41 cubic feet/second. <br />Based upon staff s analysis, the drainage level of service standard would be met by limiting off-site <br />discharge to the IRFWCD's maximum discharge rate of two inches in twenty-four hours, and <br />requiring retention of the 179,639 cubic feet of runoff for the most intense use of the property. <br />As with all development, a more detailed review will be conducted during the development approval <br />process. <br />Recreation <br />Recreation concurrency requirements apply only to residential development. Therefore, this <br />rezoning request would not be required to satisfy recreation concurrency requirements. <br />Concurrency Summary <br />Based upon the analysis conducted, staff has determined that all concurrency -mandated facilities, <br />including drainage, roads, solid waste, recreation, water, and wastewater, have adequate capacity to <br />accommodate the most intense use of the subject property under the proposed zoning district. <br />Therefore, the concurrency test has been satisfied for the subject request. <br />Generally, this rezoning is anticipated to have relatively minor impacts on environmental quality. <br />Regardless of zoning district, any wetlands on the site are protected by federal, state and local <br />regulations. While commercial development is subject to the county's 10-15% native upland plant <br />community preservation requirement, agricultural uses are exempt from that requirement. <br />Consequently, the proposed land use amendment will not have significant adverse impacts on <br />important environmental resources. <br />Compatibility with the Surrounding Area <br />The following factors indicate that the CG zoning district is appropriate for the subject property: <br />• The subject property is designated C/I on the County's Future Land Use Plan Map. <br />• The subject property abuts a major road that is programmed for expansion to accommodate <br />heavy truck traffic; <br />• The entire site is within a quarter mile of SR 60; and <br />• The site is bounded on three sides by commercial zoning. Since the site borders CG zoning <br />on the north and west, the request is for a continuation of an existing zoning pattern. <br />auGusT 22, 2000 BE I 4 P6 6 6 2 <br />• -36- 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.