My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/22/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
8/22/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:19 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:48:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/22/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The following factors indicate that development of the site under the CG district would be <br />compatible with surrounding areas: <br />0 The provisions of the SR 60 Corridor Plan apply to development of the subject property. <br />Those provisions include special standards regarding screening, landscaping, lighting, signs, <br />colors, and architectural features. <br />• The principal impacts of development of the subject property will be on the residentially <br />designated, but currently undeveloped, land along the south boundary of the subject property. <br />That land is currently zoned A-1 and consists of citrus groves. The subject property and the <br />land to the south share a border for ±302 feet. The configuration of the southern parcel <br />(nearly 20 acres with ±660 feet of road frontage and ±1,300 feet of depth) indicates that, if <br />necessary, additional buffering can be provided on that site. <br />• As M-1 designated land bordered by 82nd Avenue and commercial, multiple -family, mobile <br />home, and agricultural zoning districts, land south of the subject property is likely to be <br />developed as either a multiple -family project or as a Planned Development. Either of those <br />development types increases site design flexibility and, therefore, opportunities to buffer or <br />otherwise increase compatibility with the subject property. In other words, it is unlikely that <br />single-family residences on large lots will abut the subject property. <br />For these reasons, staff feels that general commercial development on the subject property would <br />be compatible with surrounding areas. <br />Rezoning requests are reviewed for consistency with all policies of the comprehensive plan. <br />Rezonings must also be consistent with the overall designation of land uses as depicted on the Future <br />Land Use Map, which include agriculture, residential, recreation, conservation, and commercial and <br />industrial land uses and their densities. Commercial and industrial land uses are located in nodes <br />throughout the unincorporated areas of Indian River County. <br />The goals, objectives and policies are the most important parts of the Comprehensive Plan. Policies <br />are statements in the plan which identify the actions which the county will take in order to direct the <br />community's development. As courses of action committed to by the county, policies provide the <br />basis for all county land development decisions. While all comprehensive plan policies are <br />important, some have more applicability than others in reviewing rezoning requests. Of particular <br />applicability for this request are the following policies and objectives. <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 <br />Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 states that the commercial land use designation is intended <br />for uses such as retail and wholesale trade, offices, business and personal services, residential <br />treatment centers, limited residential uses, and other similar type uses. In addition, that policy states <br />that all commercial uses must be located within an existing or future urban service area. <br />Since the subject property is located within a commercial/industrial node within the county's urban <br />service area, the request is consistent with Future Land Use Element Policy 1.15 - <br />As part of the staff analysis, all policies in the comprehensive plan were considered. Based on this <br />analysis, staff determined that the proposed zoning district is consistent with the comprehensive <br />plan. <br />AUGUST 22, 2000 <br />-37- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.