Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br />Commissioner Macht inquired why all of the rights-of-way were not being <br />abandoned, and Director Boling explained that when this request for abandonment first <br />reached staff, the adjacent owners to the middle segment were part of the application. He <br />understood that the middle segment was subsequently withdrawn from the request by the <br />property owner to the north, because it is for sale and he thought they did not want to get into <br />the abandonment request. <br />Commissioner Macht stated that was incorrect because he knew the person who <br />owned the property and the property was not for sale. Director Boling reiterated his <br />understanding that the owner withdrew because of a pending sale. <br />Chairman Adams pointed out there was nothing in the backup that anything had been <br />withdrawn, she believed the request for abandonment was for 6th Street, 6th Place, and 7`h <br />Street. <br />Commissioner Macht stressed that he knew the lady who owned the property and it <br />was definitely not for sale, and Director Boling advised that he had checked again with the <br />Planner who confirmed his understanding of the withdrawal. <br />In response to Chairman Adams' inquiry, Director Boling advised that if approved, <br />the end parcels would still have frontage on what would be the "dead-end" of the road rights- <br />of-way and each would have their own access. He added that it would be like moving the <br />cul de sac further to the east. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard in <br />this matter. <br />Greg Kingsley, 6385 7`h Street, reported that the property owner who withdrew is on <br />the north side. The gentleman has decided to retire and has the property "up for sale"; he <br />does not want to get into any abandonment issues or something which might prevent the sale <br />September 5, 2000 <br />55 <br />BK 114 PG 789 <br />