Laserfiche WebLink
basis of paving was for the developers and the developers should be paying for it. <br />Director Davis responded that the developer is paying his share <br />Chairman Adams pointed out that the remainder of roadway to be paved would be two <br />short stretches, one on each of the roadways. If those areas were not paved, they would be <br />very difficult to grade. She had asked Ms. Gentile to determine the assessment if all property <br />owners were to share in paying for just those two sections and with the developer paying for <br />the section he was required to pave. <br />Commissioner Stanbridge wanted to hear those figures and suggested it be called <br />"Alternative 3". <br />Ms. Gentile then explained what was called "Alternative #3". The developer would <br />pave what is required as per their site plan approval. The unpaved portions, about 150 feet <br />and 139 feet, could be assessed to all of the property owners fronting on the areas marked <br />in orange on the displayed site map. The cost would be about $6,734.00 per acre, and the <br />average lot size would be assessed $1,077.45 per lot. She further advised that the resolution <br />could be altered along with the assessment roll, prior to having them recorded in the public <br />records. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, SECONDED BY <br />Commissioner Macht, the Board unanimously approved <br />"Alternative 3" and adopted Resolution No. 2000-097 <br />confirming the assessment roll for certain paving and drainage <br />improvements to a portion of 19th Avenue SW between 10th <br />Street SW and 9th Street SW and 10th Street SW between 20th <br />Avenue SW and 18th Avenue SW. <br />September 5, 2000 <br />66 <br />BK 1 I Li PG 800 <br />• 1 <br />