Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />Article IX, 9.1.(a), Site Plan/Permitting/Changes; Article X, 10.4., Final Payment; and <br />Article XIV, 14.3., Construction Drawings. <br />Next, concerning the Interlocal Agreement, Vice Chairman Ginn thought the City <br />should pay their own share of the ad valorem taxes. <br />Chairman Adams asked about the 10.7% calculation, and Administrator Chandler <br />explained that it was based on the City's contribution versus the County's contribution. <br />In response to Chairman Adams' question, Mr. Reid explained the events that might <br />lead to arbitration. <br />The Commissioners had no questions concerning the Escrow Agreement, the <br />replacement Capital Reserve Account Agreement, or the Parking Agreement. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn suggested a clarification on the resolution under "C", and Mr. <br />Reid advised that the language in the proposed resolution mirrors the Treasury regulations <br />which authorize the action. <br />There were no questions concerning the Dodger/de Guardiola Development <br />Agreement. <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />concerning this matter. <br />Deputy County Attorney Collins introduced the ordinance and what it proposes. He <br />advised it was advertised for public hearing this past Tuesday, September 5, 2000, and the <br />public hearing was opened and continued to this meeting and time. He read aloud the <br />proposed amendments to Sections 120.01 and 210.03 which were underlined in the agenda <br />backup materials. <br />County Attorney Bangel suggested that the Chairman entertain public comments on <br />the ordinance as part of the public hearing separately from comments on the agreements. <br />September 7, 2000 <br />• <br />8 <br />0 <br />