Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />would remain under the aegis of the Dodgers. <br />Chairman Adams asked about the 30 -day period under 18.03(a), and Administrator <br />Chandler was comfortable with that turn -around time. <br />Mr. Reid added that any type of response, even "denied", on a documented request <br />satisfies the requirement. <br />Chairman Adams then moved to the Development Agreement (2.B.3.). She noticed <br />that the County is intimately involved in the development procedure and inquired about the <br />reasoning behind it. <br />Administrator Chandler explained that since we are using public dollars for what will <br />be a public facility, we are required by state law to comply with the State's CCNA. All the <br />language and provisions in the agreement are tied to the CCNA and Administrator Chandler <br />explained the procedure in detail. <br />Concerning the construction fund, which will be under the direction of the County, <br />Vice Chairman Ginn inquired if the County would be reimbursed for staffs' time. She <br />pointed out that Public Works Director James W. Davis would be involved and his <br />department is already extremely busy. <br />Administrator Chandler stated that one of the things considered was County stafftime <br />and he believed it would not be extensive. There is no provision for reimbursement, but the <br />Dodgers are aware of the form for submissions. These safeguards are necessary for the <br />distribution of the funds. <br />In response to Vice Chairman Ginn's inquiry about the "draw schedule" (page 247), <br />Mr. Reid detailed how that would be a part of the design/build agreement and also explained <br />the requisition procedure. <br />Mr. Reid and Administrator Chandler further responded to Vice Chairman Ginn's <br />concerns about Article VI, 6.5, County Responsibility; Article VIII, 8.3, Progress Payments; <br />September 7, 2000 <br />7 <br />OwIIPG011 <br />• <br />