10/9/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I is, one unit per 5 acres and it could be clustered under the AG -PD option. She wanted to be very cautious with expanding the urban service area. She wanted to see where the flood plains are and where the sewer and water pipes are. Commissioner Stanbridge pointed out there were 100 year flood plain areas inside the urban service area that should not be developed. There was general discussion while everyone looked at the flood plain map and also other properties which might be affected by Mr. O'Haire's proposal for his client's property. There were recollections of the special exception use in an agriculturally zoned area given for the church and school on 58' Street. Commissioner Macht favored Mr. O'Haire's solution to some degree but many other things needed to be considered. He felt it important for the Board to look at the land use map superimposed with the flood plain and determine what lies inside the current area and how they want the growth to go. The presence of sewer and water lines are a dominating factor; that is, to install them and not use them does make a lot of sense. He hoped they would not make a decision at this meeting, but ask the staff to present this in a larger sense and not on just one parcel. He preferred to reconvene with more information and projections on the impact. Commissioner Stanbridge asked Chairman Adams if she thought a motion was in order or a consensus to give direction to staff. MOTION WAS MADE BY Commissioner Stanbridge to direct staff (1) to look at the urban service area boundary and consider not extending the boundaries, but provide for a transitional area in certain locations, following the criteria presented by Mr. O'Haire, with a minimum acreage of at least 30; (2) to very October 9, 2000 j 26