Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
• 0 <br />carefully consider a planned development bonus of three units; <br />and (3) to add criteria that staff feels will protect the County <br />from a major expansion. MOTION WAS SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Macht for discussion. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn felt there was a lot in the motion and asked Director Keating if <br />all the various arguments were presented to the PZC. <br />Director Keating responded that there was not as wide a discussion as the Board heard <br />at this meeting. <br />Chairman Adams restated the motion as a direction to staff as she understood it, as <br />follows: (1) the Commissioners like Mr. O'Haire's criteria, (2) determine what other areas <br />would be impacted, (3) see the flood plain superimposed on the Comprehensive Plan map, <br />and (4) increase the minimum acreage to 30 acres. <br />Vice Chairman Ginn pointed out that staff had recommended Alternative 6, and <br />Commissioner Macht responded that was their professional opinion which it was their <br />responsibility to give, but it was the Board's responsibility to establish policy. <br />Chairman Adams recognized Pat Brown who asked the Board ton include in their <br />direction to have staff define "abut". <br />There was discussion about insurance rates and the flood plain, after which Director <br />Keating asked when and how staff should plan to bring this back to the Board. <br />Deputy County Attorney Will Collins thought the Board was talking about having a <br />transitional zoning, which is not presently in our Comprehensive Plan, so he thought the time <br />to bring it back would be during the January window of Comp Plan amendment submissions <br />which would give staff time to work out a proposal and get input from the public at an <br />official public hearing. <br />October 9, 2000 <br />27 <br />r <br />