10/9/2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Director Keating agreed that January would be the next window. However, because there was not a consensus, he suggested staff could come back in several weeks with the additional analysis and proposals in order to firm up a proposal to submit in January. Mr. O'Haire questioned the November window, and Director Keating responded that applications for that window had been taken in July. They have gone through the PZC procedure, and are about ready to bring to the Board. Director Keating reminded Mr. O'Haire that his appearance before the PZC had been changed a few times to accommodate Mr. O'Haire's schedule. There was more discussion and Deputy County Attorney Collins asked about the timing requirements; Director Keating responded that the July Comp Plan amendments have gone through the PZC and they will soon be advertised for hearing by the Board of County Commissioners (within the next 3-4 weeks). Director Keating stated that the Clontz property came in during the January window, went through PZC and the Board. It was denied by the Board and staff was directed to go back and give Mr. Clontz some relief. Director Keating thought the issue was whether it could be put with the other Comp Plan amendments as it has already been through the PZC. Deputy County Attorney Collins recalled that the Board denied going to M-1, 8 units per acre. If the applicant modified the request to RS -1, it may be possible to get Mr. Clontz's matter to the Board of County Commissioners as an RS -1, but they could not do a county- wide plan amendment. Staffwould have to comeback with the information the Board wants on that. Deputy County Attorney Collins pointed out that Mr. Clontz's application asked for 8 units per acre so a request for RS -1 zoning would have to go back to the PZC. It was recalled that the PZC decision was appealed to the Board of County Commissioners and also October 9, 2000 % 115 PG 383 28