Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />applicant has not submitted an alternative grading plan that satisfied the cut and fill balance <br />requirement without needing the waiver. The applicant is requesting the waiver so he will not be <br />required to construct an on site retention area if the waiver is granted. <br />Alternative No. 1 <br />Grant the cut and fill balance waiver based on the criteria of Section 930.07(2)(d)1. <br />Alternative No. 2 <br />Deny the cut and fill waiver. Require an on site retention area be provided to compensate for the <br />proposed floodplain displacement. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Staff recommends approval of Alternative No. 1. <br />1. Letter from H. Lee Chapman <br />2. Calculations for cut and fill from Russell C. Morrison, P.E. dated Oct. 11, 2000 <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Stanbridge, <br />SECONDED by Commissioner Ginn, the Board <br />unanimously granted the cut and fill balance waiver <br />for Earring Point Tower, Atlantic Coast Tower of <br />Florida, based on the criteria of Section <br />93 0.07(2)(d) 1, as recommended by staff. <br />OCTOBER 24, 2000 <br />-23- <br />• <br />,.A <br />