Laserfiche WebLink
other types of birds, livestock, dogs, etc). To date, staff's experience with animal noise <br />complaints in agricultural areas bears out this distinction between rooster concentrations and <br />concentrations of other animals and birds. <br />Allowing "by right" a reasonable number of roosters on agriculturally <br />necessary for legitimate poultry uses and should be considered o zoned sites is <br />all agricultural areas. Based upon information provided b Agricultural may and compatible in <br />Director Dan Culbert from the University of Florida Institute of F000d and Agriculturaln Service <br />Science (IFAS), and based upon input from interested parties, the Agricultural <br />y <br />Committee (AAC) determined that two dozen (24) roosters on an gnn agricultural <br />Advisory <br />should be allowed "b right',. Y given agricultural site <br />YThe AAC also determined that 25 or more roosters on an <br />agricultural site would reasonably constitute a "specialty farm", and that conditions placed <br />on such a farm should accommodate the use but also provide some visual screening from <br />neighbors that also could provide a small degree of noise attenuation for neighbors (see <br />attachment #5). <br />Staff has given significant weight to the AAC's recommendations and h <br />The proposed LDR amendment would <br />recommendations in the proposed LDR amendment. as used those <br />allow the keeping of up to 24 roosters The as adult male chickens that crow) as a "by <br />right" permitted use in agricultural areas. This standard could be enacted via the proposed <br />definitions contained in section 1 of the proposed ordinance (see attachment #6). Under the <br />1.Proposed amendment, any site containing 25 or more roosters would be defined as a <br />specialty farm" and would be defined not to be "poultry raisin <br />Permitted use by right). A "specialtyg" ("Poultry raising" is a <br />use as is required for that use unr the existing Lwould �� administrative Permit approval, <br />The proposed LDR amendment would also add specific land use criteria for specialty farms <br />to address concentrations of 25 or more roosters. The "specialty farm" criteria would require <br />concentrations of roosters to be located in a designated area or structure that is set back from <br />surrounding properties by a distance of 75' or more, unless the roosters are kept in an <br />enclosed, soundproofed structure If such a soundproofed structure .is proposed, <br />agricultural zoning district setback would apply (A-1, A-2, and A-3 districts) In addition <br />to the special setbackisound-proofed enclosure criterion, the proposed LDR amendment <br />would require physical buffering similar to the active agricultural buffer standard used <br />elsewhere in the LDRs. Such a buffer (see attachment #7) would provide visual screening <br />and some noise attenuation. Such a buffer could consist of existing vegetation (preserved) <br />and/or planted vegetation located between the site boundaries and the designated rooster <br />area. <br />ALTERNATIVES: <br />There are several alternative approaches the county can take, including the proposed LDR <br />amendment, if it wants to regulate the raising of roosters in agricultural areas. These are: <br />1 • Establish a threshold number of roosters allowed(e.g. 5 10, 20, <br />50, r below the <br />threshold threshold, allow that number of roosters on site by right, without c°nditions.oAbove the <br />and bufferinPically classify the og. peration as a "specialty fans" and require special setbacks <br />