My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/2000
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2000
>
10/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 12:14:20 PM
Creation date
6/16/2015 3:37:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/24/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />NOTE. This is the alternative supported by the AAC and incorporated into the current LDR <br />amendment proposal (see attachment #6). _ <br />2. Establish a rooster per acre standard (e.g. 1 rooster per acre) . <br />OPTION: also establish a specialty farm threshold and conditions (see #1 above). <br />NOTE: This was the alternative initially proposed by staff and rejected by the PSAC <br />(Professional Services Advisory Committee) at its September 25' meeting. Specifically, <br />what was proposed at that time was the following: <br />One (1) rooster per 2.5 acres. <br />Over 10 roosters constitutes a "specialty farm". <br />"Specialty farms" provide an agricultural buffer around a designated rooster <br />area that is set back 600' from property lines (requires 40 acre tract). <br />3. Establish a rooster to hen ratio (e.g. no more than 1 rooster per 4 hens). <br />OPTION: also establish a "specialty farm" threshold and conditions (see #1 above). <br />4. Establish noise standards for agricultural areas to be applied to all agricultural uses. <br />(Currently, agricultural zoning districts are specifically exempt from the county's noise <br />ordinance requirements). <br />NOTE: This option was recommended by the PSAC. <br />5. Allow specialty farms in A-2 (10 acre minimum) and A-3 (20 acre minimum) zoning <br />districts only. <br />These types of alternatives were discussed by the PSAC, the AAC, and the PZC. The <br />recommendations of those committees, the Commission, and staff are as follows: <br />• PSAC Recommendation: Deny the originally proposed LDR amendment (1 rooster per 2.5 <br />acres, over 10 roosters constitutes a "specialty farm", require a 600' setback and agricultural <br />buffer), and have the Agricultural Advisory Committee consider a noise ordinance in <br />agricultural areas. <br />• AAC Recommendation: Adopt an LDR amendment defining operations with 25 or more <br />roosters as a "specialty farm" requiring a conditional use permit (e.g. administrative permit) <br />and a 75 foot setback with a Type "B" buffer. <br />• PZC Recommendation: Voted 3-2 to deny the proposed amendment. <br />■ Staff Recommendation: Based upon the AAC recommendation, adopt an LDR amendment <br />defining operations with 25 or more roosters as a "specialty farm" requiring administrative <br />Permit approval in the A-1, A-2, and A-3 districts. Require a 75' setback between property <br />boundaries and designated rooster areas or a 30' setback if roosters are kept in an enclosed, <br />sound proofed structure. Also, require a Type `B" buffer with 6' opaque feature (same as <br />active agricultural buffer) between the designated rooster area and site boundaries. <br />OCTOBER 24, 2000 <br />-71- <br />0 <br />'A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.